Author |
Message |
Topic: Unoffical Cobracards Errata #1
|
PorterTroll
Replies: 52
Views: 25590
|
[quote="CarpeGuitarrem"][quote="PorterTroll"]To refute your first point: If you include this card in your deck, your probably not using Aragorns Bow, Ranger’s Longbow or any type of archery anyway....
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 4:40 pm
|
|
Topic: Make a card of yourself!
|
PorterTroll
Replies: 27
Views: 12525
|
*PorterTroll, Contentious Fighter
Companion*Man
Str: 9
Vit: 4
Res: 5
Response: If an opponent talks about a new T&D or Age’s End card, spot a valid point to argue it to the most extr...
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 4:27 pm
|
|
Topic: Unoffical Cobracards Errata #1
|
PorterTroll
Replies: 52
Views: 25590
|
[quote="CarpeGuitarrem"]Note that it also COMPLETELY shuts down all Freeps archery, including the most potent card out there, Aragorn’s Bow, Ranger’s Longbow. Fair? Who said fairness was a standar...
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 4:12 pm
|
|
Topic: Spoiler: The One Ring, The Great Ring
|
PorterTroll
Replies: 104
Views: 44458
|
[quote="CarpeGuitarrem"]Wait...adding burdens is no longer a steep cost? There’s a reason they reprinted Steward’s Tomb.
I think that the only balance this card needs to to require the Ring-bea...
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 3:59 pm
|
|
Topic: Best Uruk-hai Weapon
|
PorterTroll
Replies: 24
Views: 9333
|
I like your siggy, that is the line from the episode when Bart goes to work at a Burlesque house.
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 3:40 pm
|
|
Topic: Spoiler: The One Ring, The Great Ring
|
PorterTroll
Replies: 104
Views: 44458
|
That is completely different. Clever Hobbits requires you to ditch conditions for the bonus, conditions are not innumerable. Ring Bound Hobbit decks can remove burdens like mad. I’ve known ...
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 3:37 pm
|
|
Topic: Unoffical Cobracards Errata #1
|
PorterTroll
Replies: 52
Views: 25590
|
[quote="CarpeGuitarrem"]Elven Armaments, I dunno. I think it’s balanced as-is. Okay, so maybe restrict it for Expanded. But not in Standard. R-list in Expanded, fine for Standard ought to be good en...
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 1:21 pm
|
|
Topic: Ninja Revolutionized: The New Ninja Gollum
|
PorterTroll
Replies: 69
Views: 30007
|
[quote="maxidoodle"]I like that you’ve slimmed it down, but there are still a lot of unnecessary cards in there. You’ll need at LEAST 3 promise keeping and 3 Not this time! Get rid of set up and c...
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 11:53 am
|
|
Topic: Ninja Revolutionized: The New Ninja Gollum
|
PorterTroll
Replies: 69
Views: 30007
|
Well done! This deck will be a force to be reckoned with!
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 11:45 am
|
|
Topic: Ninja Revolutionized: The New Ninja Gollum
|
PorterTroll
Replies: 69
Views: 30007
|
I really enjoyed the article, it was well written and made for an easy read. One major flaw, however, is that it is way, WAY, too big. Even with a deck type that can cycle like mad, 43/43 is far to ...
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 11:27 am
|
|
|