| Author |
Message |
Rate this article!
| 5 (Best) |
| [ 2 ] 28% |
| |
| 4 |
| [ 5 ] 71% |
| |
| 3 |
| [ 0 ] 0% |
| |
| 2 |
| [ 0 ] 0% |
| |
| 1 (Worst) |
| [ 0 ] 0% |
| |
Total Votes : 7 |
|
| Heinry |
![]() Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 4:53 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 20 Oct 2006
Posts: 17
Location: Colorado Springs
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| sperzdechly |
![]() Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 3:15 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 05 May 2006
Posts: 131
Location: Warsaw (Poland)
|
Nice article, although your proposed deck seems to be a bit old-fashioned. You’re writing about new Rohandalf, but all the cards are relatively old. Why didn’t you include any card from sets 12-15? In hunters set, there are some really good cards for Rohan nad Gandalf. If you don’t like it or don’t need it, you could write about it in the article. Personally, I’m missing this explanation.
Remarks:
1. Final Account is on the X-list, so deck is not for sanctioned play.
2. I’d play 4x Simbelmyne and only one Herugrim. Cards like Gamling, Symbelmyne and AWINL are great, because you can take out many FP cards from deck, leaving only shadow, which helps a lot to set up your shadow hand.
3. You could have mention about possible shadows sides to add to this
FP side. What shadow do you suggest, why? What shadow isn’t a good choice, why?
I won’t give you a note yet. I hope you’ll unpgrade this article a bit before the end of the month. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Pipeweed |
![]() Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 4:15 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 1010
Location: Earth (I think)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Forum index » Lord of the Rings TCG » LOTR TCG Strategy Article Contest
