Author |
Message |
bibfortuna25 |
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 10:09 am |
|
|
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 615
Location: Springfield, OR
|
Yes, there are a handful of cards that say the Ring-bearer can’t take archery wounds, but in 99% of games, he can take them if you wish. |
All cards do what they say. |
|
Back to top |
|
AnxiousChieftain |
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 12:09 pm |
|
|
Joined: 15 Jul 2005
Posts: 3947
Location: Maryland
|
orian wrote: yup, problem is... against archery you can’t assign wounds to your ring bearer...
Wait, doesn’t Consorting With Wizards allow Bilbo to take archery wounds? Or maybe I’m reading your post wrong. |
MODS RULE. - lem0nhead |
|
Back to top |
|
TheHobbit13 |
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 10:54 pm |
|
|
Joined: 27 Jul 2006
Posts: 1303
Location: minnesota
|
does it have to say specificly fromdraw deck in order for you to play it from draw deck |
|
|
Back to top |
|
bibfortuna25 |
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 4:03 am |
|
|
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 615
Location: Springfield, OR
|
Yes. Unless specified otherwise, "play" is always from your hand. |
All cards do what they say. |
|
Back to top |
|
|