| Author |
Message |
| La_Sin_Grail |
![]() Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 4:30 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 806
Location: Maryland
|
| I don’t really see sift played to being with, though... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Felipe Musco |
![]() Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:20 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 2434
Location: Florianópolis, SC, Brasil
|
| Japanese player’s (can’t remember his name) "True Reanimator" featured Zombify, Vigor Mortis, Compulsive Research AND Sift, all in one build. Sift and Mortis in smaller numbers, of course. But they were played. |
| I don't like YOU. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| La_Sin_Grail |
![]() Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:30 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 806
Location: Maryland
|
Oh right, I bet he wanted to play two copies for an alternate sac outlet to four researches?
But yeah, it makes sense to use zombify and mortis because if they kill the reanimated thing, you can just do it again. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Felipe Musco |
![]() Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:38 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 2434
Location: Florianópolis, SC, Brasil
|
| I believe he played 4 Researches, 1-2 Sift, some other tricky stuff, some counters, 4 Zombify and 2-4 Vigor Mortis (or 2 Mortis and 2 other weird things, IDK). Bizarre build, if you ask me, but I’ve been meaning t tweak it with Leyline of the Void and that new card that reanimates everything at once. |
| I don't like YOU. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| La_Sin_Grail |
![]() Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 9:25 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 806
Location: Maryland
|
| I didn’t see what’s bizarre about it, personally. Turn one acceleration means discarding turn two, reanimation turn three. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| r2d2quino |
![]() Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:42 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 49
Location:
|
| What do you mean turn one acceleration? Isn’t it a black and blue deck? How would it accelerate? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| La_Sin_Grail |
![]() Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 3:46 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 806
Location: Maryland
|
| Well many builds were playing B/U/G for turn one acceleration and a better way to use vigor mortis, using BoPs to fix mana and defend against vore. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Felipe Musco |
![]() Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 3:55 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 2434
Location: Florianópolis, SC, Brasil
|
Although I’ve tried a build like that, but I think counterspells are better than splashing another color for speed. If you can’t speed up your deck, slow down your opponent’s!  |
| I don't like YOU. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| La_Sin_Grail |
![]() Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 3:59 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 806
Location: Maryland
|
| Really? I tend to think a turn 3 simic sky swallower does the trick better than countering, but I’ve always beena powerbeat/agro/aggressive player. there are no wrong threats, but there are wrong answers. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Felipe Musco |
![]() Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 4:03 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 2434
Location: Florianópolis, SC, Brasil
|
| But a turn 4 SSS AFTER countering an Eye of Nowhere, Umezawa’s Jitte or anything with Spell Snare sure seems nice, too! |
| I don't like YOU. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Forum index » Magic: The Gathering » MTG Deck Clinics » Standard (Type 2)