LotR TCG Wiki → Card Sets:  All 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 → Forums:  TLHH CC

 
Cobra Cards Player Community Forum Index
 Forum index » Lord of the Rings TCG » Open Lord of the Rings Discussion
Author Message
Pipsqueak
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 1:44 pm
Joined: 06 Jan 2006 Posts: 331 Location: A northerner down south
Gondor is great, but everything depends on roaming minions. but i would still say that it's one of the best
Long live the southern bros. Homage
syndrome
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:52 pm
Joined: 20 Jul 2005 Posts: 423 Location: A cold place.
But seriously, Smeagol pwns. When was the last time you saw an 80, dam + 9 gondor companion?
http://myspace/delicatesituation
Guest
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 11:08 am
Joined: Posts: Location:
Phazanzar wrote:
But seriously, Smeagol pwns. When was the last time you saw an 80, dam + 9 gondor companion?


For a 1-time use. Razz You're screwed after that.
syndrome
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 2:38 pm
Joined: 20 Jul 2005 Posts: 423 Location: A cold place.
Site 9 = no more sites.

Besides, he can have a 11 base strength, 13 with ring on. And Nasty (I have 4 in my deck) makes him strength +1 for each Gollum card you can see. 1 or 2 of these is used in huge smeagol setup, but as you saw last night, I can easily get +10(+) added to his strength with (1) twilight.

He is a tough little bugger.
http://myspace/delicatesituation
Pipsqueak
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 4:28 pm
Joined: 06 Jan 2006 Posts: 331 Location: A northerner down south
i agree with phazanzar about solo smeagol decks. i also agree with him back on jan 02, about moria orcs. archers in particular. Cool
Long live the southern bros. Homage
Guest
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 5:17 pm
Joined: Posts: Location:
Phazanzar wrote:
Site 9 = no more sites.

Besides, he can have a 11 base strength, 13 with ring on. And Nasty (I have 4 in my deck) makes him strength +1 for each Gollum card you can see. 1 or 2 of these is used in huge smeagol setup, but as you saw last night, I can easily get +10(+) added to his strength with (1) twilight.

He is a tough little bugger.


I do remember a time when he was unable to take on a couple of Uruk-Hai... There still is a problem, if you don't draw those cards, that is, the cards you need, you're screwed with Solo-Smeagol. I've noticed that sort of trend with your decks, either you're totally invincible (almost at least) or you become sword fodder. You have been lucky the last 2 or 3 times we've fought though... Sad
syndrome
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 11:55 pm
Joined: 20 Jul 2005 Posts: 423 Location: A cold place.
Not lucky, cycle-management Wink
http://myspace/delicatesituation
Guest
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 12:55 am
Joined: Posts: Location:
Phazanzar wrote:
Not lucky, cycle-management Wink


AKA: Hand-Cloggage
syndrome
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 12:57 pm
Joined: 20 Jul 2005 Posts: 423 Location: A cold place.
theOmnipotentOne wrote:
Phazanzar wrote:
Not lucky, cycle-management Wink


AKA: Hand-Cloggage
I discard a card almost every chance I can reconcile... If I choose a less worthy card to discard instead of a clever hobbits or nasty, there is no hand cloggage... I couldn't get rid of it anyway.

Where Shall We Go and Don't Look at them take care of a lot of cloggage.

Smeagol is pretty apt at cycling.
http://myspace/delicatesituation

Display posts from previous:  

 Forum index » Lord of the Rings TCG » Open Lord of the Rings Discussion
All times are UTC - 4
Page 2 of 2 [19 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2
View previous topic   View next topic