You mean...like Clever Hobbits? Should Solo Smeagol be banned?

Wait...adding burdens is no longer a steep cost? There’s a reason they reprinted Steward’s Tomb.

I think that the only balance this card needs to to require the Ring-bearer wearing the One Ring to use the ability, maybe tone it down to a +2, and then that should do it. I suspect we’ll see some cards that trigger off of the RB wearing the One Ring, and I’m looking forward to it.

You laughed at Uruk Spy and Too Much Attention. I’ll agree, those aren’t powerful cards. Yet. But metas change.

Can you honestly say that adding a burden, or even two or three will harm a ring bound hobbits deck in the least? No! They will be gone again in a phase or two.

If they made the skirmish ability only available when the RB was wearing the ring, then it would help the balance of the card. But to truly make it fair, they would have to make the ability "limit +6" or maybe, MAYBE "limit +9". Anything more than that is rediculous.

I continue to laugh at Uruk Spy and Too much attention, they are weak, crappy rares that will never be worth more than the paper they’re printed on. I mean, come on, do you really think a new meta is coming that will carry these cards to the top of everyone’s "gotta have!" list? There isn’t a snowballs chance in hell that will happen.

I never said anything about getting rid of sudden fury. And no, I don’t think sauron is too strong since his cost is huge it balances him out. This ring, however, when paired with ring bound hobbits has basically NO COST! Burdens mean nothing for hobbits. And you shouldn’t have to play with rangers and cycle one site through the site path just to counter one card. If you have to go through such a huge measure to stop a card’s effect, there is no doubt that it is broken and I think you know that.