Author |
Message |
How playable is Stern Words?
5 (Best) |
[ 8 ] 66% |
|
4 |
[ 3 ] 25% |
|
3 |
[ 0 ] 0% |
|
2 |
[ 1 ] 8% |
|
1 (Worst) |
[ 0 ] 0% |
|
Total Votes : 12 |
|
FortunesRazor |
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 1:07 pm |
|
|
Joined: 19 Apr 2007
Posts: 181
Location: IN
|
Go look at that posted choke deck using Gandalf and frodo with a huorn getting all 4 copies and a better gandalf with saved from the fire! Dravius posted it in standard deck build. Obviously with rule of four you couldn’t have it set at site one, but probably by 3. And if you’re lucky enough to have one in hand and a saved from the fire you might. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
TheShyzle |
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 4:13 pm |
|
|
Joined: 19 May 2006
Posts: 289
Location: Grand Blanc, MI
|
|
Back to top |
|
AnxiousChieftain |
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 8:39 am |
|
|
Joined: 15 Jul 2005
Posts: 3947
Location: Maryland
|
Wow... you can juggle +8 strength around the fellowship easily. WAY overpowered.
5 for playability.
- AC |
MODS RULE. - lem0nhead |
|
Back to top |
|
Lost Heir |
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:57 am |
|
|
Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 225
Location: Ohio
|
Overpowered card, but I like the idea they had for transferring conditions throughout the fellowship. I don’t like the pic.
5. |
Check out my Trade List!
View the newest culture in my DC set, The Lords of Gondor: Gandalf |
|
Back to top |
|
Hedgehog81 |
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:35 am |
|
|
Joined: 08 May 2007
Posts: 104
Location: Italy
|
Are we sure that when u transfer something u don’t have to pay the cost again? |
"Southrons were bold men and grim, and fierce in despair..." |
|
Back to top |
|
TheHobbit13 |
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:37 am |
|
|
Joined: 27 Jul 2006
Posts: 1303
Location: minnesota
|
pritty sure |
If you like LOTR then maybe you would like redemption ccg PM me for more info |
|
Back to top |
|
DáinIronfoot |
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:47 am |
|
|
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 4594
Location: Beltsville, MD, USA
|
Hedgehog81 wrote: Are we sure that when u transfer something u don’t have to pay the cost again?
99% sure, because unlike transferring possessions and such, this is an ability of the card itself. And since the ability lacks a cost, I think you can do it for free. |
Best regards, Dáin, Vice Aftokrator of the Chosen Ones
Check out Lasting Alliances, The Road Ahead, and Ages of Middle-earth, three of my five dream card sets that make up Wars of the Ring. Oh, and I have a trade list now!
Also, if you're into DCs or RPGs (or even if you're not!), check out Realms of Middle-earth, the sequel to CG's "DC Adventure", Realms of the North! |
|
Back to top |
|
Apopatos |
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 3:53 am |
|
|
Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 629
Location: Hellas
|
100% sure. You do not pay the cost! I had a disagreement for that in a tournament and I was correct!
BTW 5 for his playability but it is too overpowered because it is not discarded if bearer is not assigned to skirmish... |
"...I stomp round and round, / Never lie on the ground, / Not even to die. / Oliphaunt am I..."
Apop's trading list
My references
Your deck is small... |
|
Back to top |
|
lem0nhead |
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 3:55 am |
|
|
Joined: 02 Apr 2007
Posts: 2981
Location: Blood Island
|
Yup transferring stuff does not cost unless its posessions in the fellowship phase.
Stupid card. Not unique and way too easy to manipulate. 5 for playability, 0 for balance. |
Ban shampoo, demand real poo.
My Trade List and CC References
"Smart guy, especially considering his head is filled with lemon juice and seeds. That boy’s juicy brain is FULL of good stuff" ~ DainIronfoot
"No fair! And all I got was an oily unconscious steward!" ~ Pippin.
"Okay, stop me if you've heard this one. An elf, a man, and a dwarf walk into the Riddermark..." ~ Eomer |
|
Back to top |
|
BearerOfQuality |
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 6:00 am |
|
|
Joined: 20 Jun 2007
Posts: 217
Location: United Kingdom
|
I agree, Stern Words and Strength in his blood are just wrong. I’m gonna give it 1, just out of spite. Nice picture though |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|