| Author |
Message |
| Celebrimbor |
![]() Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 5:42 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 953
Location: UNKNOWN
|
Says, "while you can spot 4 mounts, those mounts cannot be discarded by shadow player".
Now, if I have 5 mounts in play, does Hama still protect all 5??? |
My Trading List
Popcorn is not gooey like fat, and also not crunchy like potato chips, but crispy like lettuce which makes it a healthy snack.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
| menace64 |
![]() Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 5:55 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 836
Location: Wichita, Kansas
|
| Yes, because you can always just change the 4 you’re spotting. |
Riddle 9
When I came to Abraham I let him live just a moment longer. When I came to Moses I saved his life more than once. But the salmon... I regret to say I had a hand in its death.
Who am I? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Elessar's Socks |
![]() Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:19 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 349
Location:
|
That’s some funky wording. Haleth never gives you a choice of which mounts to spot, does he? Because "can spot" means you’re required to spot all of them, and if you were able to spot four, his ability will trigger. Also I don’t think the rules cover timing issues on when you can change the particular objects being spotted if it’s a continuous effect.
So I’d argue that however it really works, Haleth ends up protecting all Free Peoples mounts. Just cleaner that way.  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Gartax |
![]() Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:31 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 98
Location:
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| bibfortuna25 |
![]() Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:59 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 615
Location: Springfield, OR
|
| If you can spot 5, then you can spot 4. |
| All cards do what they say. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| NBarden |
![]() Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 8:53 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 5468
Location: I don't know...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Elessar's Socks |
![]() Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 9:03 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 349
Location:
|
| I’d say no... still can’t spot a mount. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| DáinIronfoot |
![]() Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 9:43 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 4594
Location: Beltsville, MD, USA
|
| Yeah, I’ve considered that same question before, NB. I agree with ES...I think that since there is not an actual mount involved with Stable Master, just a mounted companion, Haleth doesn’t work. |
Best regards, Dáin, Vice Aftokrator of the Chosen Ones
Check out Lasting Alliances, The Road Ahead, and Ages of Middle-earth, three of my five dream card sets that make up Wars of the Ring. Oh, and I have a trade list now!
Also, if you're into DCs or RPGs (or even if you're not!), check out Realms of Middle-earth, the sequel to CG's "DC Adventure", Realms of the North! |
|
| Back to top |
|
| CarpeGuitarrem |
![]() Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 10:18 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Posts: 3361
Location: Franciscan University of Steubenville
|
| Right. "Mounted" implies nothing. It’s an unloaded keyword. However, when a companion bears a mount, they gain "mounted". Simple as that. |
| "ok, change of plans. the Cobracards christmas party is coming to my house, and we’re gunna teach FM how to hunt." (mm) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Celebrimbor |
![]() Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:09 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 953
Location: UNKNOWN
|
| Thank you for the help, people. Haleth is just weird. |
My Trading List
Popcorn is not gooey like fat, and also not crunchy like potato chips, but crispy like lettuce which makes it a healthy snack. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Forum index » Lord of the Rings TCG » LOTR TCG Gameplay Questions
