| Author |
Message |
| bobtheorc |
![]() Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:06 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 19 Mar 2006
Posts: 1218
Location: Wow, its hot in Iowa
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
![]() Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:23 pm |
|
|
|
Joined:
Posts:
Location:
|
I VOTE FOR IN BRACKET ONE:
Cobra
Didn’t like the card, but Ingold’s was brutally technical and too much Yeahdfl.
Sick.
I VOTE FOR IN BRACKET TWO:
I cannot
I VOTE FOR IN BRACKET THREE:
Phazanzar
Same reason as cobra.
I VOTE FOR IN BRACKET FOUR:
sickofpalantirs
Hazael’s card was broken. nuff said.
Now, I hereby make this decree.
I, theOmnipotentOne (referred to as "X"), state that in my upmost and completely unabiding and omniscient power that "X" has complete political power over Hazael (referred to as "Y"), Phazanzar (referred to as "Z"), pipsqueak (referred to as "S"), Cobra (referred to as "X4"), Ingold55 (reffered to as "G2") and AnxiousChieftain (referred to as "T4-3").
This political power that X has over S, Y, Z, X4, T4-3, and G2 will be forced upon at no point in anyway.
If S misbehaves in anyway. X shall pummel him with 4 large mallets.
If Z misbehaves in anyway, X shall use naughty words upon him.
If Y misbehaves in anyway, X shall angerly throw an eraser at him.
If X4 misbehaves in anyway, X shall angerly shake fists at him.
If T4-3 misbehaves in anyway, X shall make him regret it.
If G2 misbehaves in anyway, X shall give him Boromir, Hero of Osgiliath and a Grimbeorn, Beorning Chieftain then take them away quickly, leaving him to cry. So has it been written, so has it (will be) enforced.
Have a nice day. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| syndrome |
![]() Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:21 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 423
Location: A cold place.
|
I thought like this: You can have 4 out. Hence why I said (limit once). Plus, it sticks with them the entire turn... say... a player plays a minon of 3 vit, you can use x2 cards on it and that minion must exert twice when it’s assigned.
Or are you saying it would be perfectly acceptable to have 4 out so every [orc] minion would have to exert up to 4 times when they are assigned to  companions? I guess I didn’t take the [orc] into account when I made it 
My votes:
Bracket 1: Cobra - I don’t see why Ingold brought galadriel into it :S
Bracket 2: AC - tOO’s was ... weird. I liked AC’s.
Bracket 3: -----
Bracket 4: sick’s. Hazael = ouch. |
| http://myspace/delicatesituation |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Cobra |
![]() Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:48 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 1202
Location: Austin, TX, USA
|
Phazanzar wrote: Or are you saying it would be perfectly acceptable to have 4 out so every [orc] minion would have to exert up to 4 times when they are assigned to companions?
Yes, exactly! 
One reason is that exerting minions is not that helpful on its own. Even with several copies of your new Foes of Mordor on the table, so that every single [orc] minion is exhausted when assignments are made, that’s not all that powerful. It’s pretty darn cool, but doesn’t actually do much unless you’re packing skirmish-phase wounding or maybe a card like Pursuit Just Behind.
Another reason is that cards like this one (that is, cards that only target a specific culture) have every right to be overpowered! If it’s worthless 80% of the time, it better be really good the other 20%. Unless playing it creates a true auto-win situation, it will be a fair card overall IMO. |
| Last edited by Cobra on Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:05 am; edited 1 time in totalhttp://cobracards.com -- Web's best deals on Trading Card Games. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| syndrome |
![]() Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:53 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 423
Location: A cold place.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| sickofpalantirs |
![]() Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 7:40 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 7750
Location: somwhere, over the rainbow way up high. There's a land that I heard of once in a lullaby.
|
1. Cobra
2. hoo il like both of them but tOO’s I would use so i vote tOO
3. wah I like d bobtheorcs card but thart limit thing does kill it so Phazanzar
4. no vote
Yeah if i misbehave tOO won’t kill me |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Pipsqueak |
![]() Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 11:42 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 331
Location: A northerner down south
|
Update
Bracket 1
Cobra ---- 5 votes
Ingold55 - 0 votes
Bracket 2
AC -- 2 votes
tOO - 2 votes
Bracket 3
Phazanzar - 4 votes
bobtheorc -- 0 votes
Bracket 4
Hazael --------- 0 votes
sickofpalantirs - 5 votes
Well, i got more votes than i thought i would by this time.
Keep it up
btw, why am i the only one that gets pummeled with four large mallets? |
Long live the southern bros.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
| ingold55 |
![]() Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 4:28 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 1199
Location: Out on the front line
|
1. no vote {congradultions Conor  }
2 AC
3 Phazanzar
4Heazel
P.S. sorry about the "bad card" i’ll try to do better next time. |
There is a power in this world beyond any of us, and Jesus is that power and The Savior.
 this is my attempt to look cool.
Trade list (Want Balrogs and Aragorns) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
![]() Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:56 pm |
|
|
|
Joined:
Posts:
Location:
|
Pipsqueak wrote: btw, why am i the only one that gets pummeled with four large mallets?
Would you rather have me throw an eraser at you, use naughty words upon you, or make you regret it? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Pipsqueak |
![]() Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 7:39 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 331
Location: A northerner down south
|
| Um, the eraser, i guess... |
| Long live the southern bros. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Forum index » Lord of the Rings TCG » LOTR TCG Dream Cards
