MR. Lurtzy
King
   
Offline
Formats: Fellowship; Towers Standard
Posts: 2756
My name is Wepeel
Gold: +218
|
 |
« on: May 15, 2008, 09:22:34 PM » |
0
|
I need help refining my solo smeagol deck. Please help.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 17, 2008, 06:42:47 AM by NBarden »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Gil-Estel
King
   
Offline
GCCG: Heije
Formats: Movie for sure, never walk the standard path
Posts: 2315
Abuser of the Force
Gold: +177
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2008, 10:46:58 PM » |
0
|
in order for us to refine your deck, maybe it is helpful to post your deck 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
..."Elves seldom give unguarded advice, for advice is a dangerous gift, even from the wise to the wise, and all courses may run ill"...
|
|
|
TheJord
League Director
Administrator
King
   
Offline
GCCG: TheJord
Formats: Standard
Posts: 2365
High King of Rules
Gold: +138
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: May 16, 2008, 02:41:00 AM » |
0
|
Open? Expanded? Standard? Block?
More info required please
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"The rule of Gondor is mine!"
|
|
|
Elessar's Socks
Global Mod
Knight
   
Offline
Posts: 1370
"I see...I look foul and feel foul. Is that it?"
Gold: +116
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: May 16, 2008, 02:51:39 AM » |
0
|
...Great, in testing mine just died to Ulaire Lemenya, Lieutenant of Morgul + Fell Beast + Black Breath at site 3 (went first). So... maybe your deck is better than mine?? *LOL* Incidentally, if you're not too concerned about whether it's pure solo, other starting companions can be a safety net. If Fishing Boat, Gladden Homestead, and some 1-cost cards come down all at once that's a fair amount of twilight. Faramir SoD immediately comes to mind (against Ninja Gollum, there shouldn't be enough twilight for Her Ladyship), and Pippin HoSI can help your starting bid. Anyway, I'll just throw this out there after adding those and some other tweaks. Wonder if it's similar to yours; I'm learning too! 30 cards. Smeagol, Bearer of Great SecretsThe One Ring, The Ring of Rings1 Faramir, Son of Denethor (starting) 1 Pippin, Hobbit of Some Intelligence (starting) 1 Fishing Boat2 Don't Look at Them1 Follow Smeagol2 Gladden Homestead4 Never4 Poor Wretch2 Safe Passage4 There's Another Way1 Naked Waste3 Nasty4 Still Far AheadWent easy on the skirmish events because at the early sites there might not be any minions, and the clog gets in the way of a Shadow kill.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 16, 2008, 02:53:18 AM by Elessars Socks »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
lem0nhead
Vegetarian Cannibal
Global Mod
Wizard
   
Offline
Formats: Standard
Posts: 4201
Juicy Fruit
Gold: +317
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: May 16, 2008, 02:52:40 AM » |
0
|
Nice deck socks though id find a way fit 4 nasty in. That card rocks.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Elessar's Socks
Global Mod
Knight
   
Offline
Posts: 1370
"I see...I look foul and feel foul. Is that it?"
Gold: +116
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: May 16, 2008, 03:00:01 AM » |
0
|
Holy... smokes, Juicy Fruit operates at the speed of lightning! Haha, Nasty indeed rocks! Justifies all those copies of Never, too. Switched one to Naked Waste though just in case all my conditions get blown up. At that point it should be a piece of cake (  ) to remove 4 cards for a timely save. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MR. Lurtzy
King
   
Offline
Formats: Fellowship; Towers Standard
Posts: 2756
My name is Wepeel
Gold: +218
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: May 16, 2008, 09:01:25 PM » |
0
|
Open? Expanded? Standard? Block?
More info required please
Open please.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MR. Lurtzy
King
   
Offline
Formats: Fellowship; Towers Standard
Posts: 2756
My name is Wepeel
Gold: +218
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: May 20, 2008, 05:08:40 PM » |
0
|
Any more ideas (thanks socky)? What would be the best shadow to pair this with? I currently have it with nazgul but I'm open to suggestions.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DáinIronfoot
Bearded Axeman
Administrator
Maia
   
Offline
Posts: 6174
Never tickle a Dwarf!
Gold: +371
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: July 11, 2008, 12:04:56 PM » |
0
|
One note: I see ES recommending to start Pippin HoSI, but I don't think there's a need. I believe there was a ruling a while back that stated that when you begin with Smeagol BoGS as your Ring-bearer, you do NOT add a burden, since he is NOLINK never actually "played" when you use him as the RB. You only have to add the burden if you play him as another companion in the starting fellowship or in your deck (though why you would NOT use him as the RB is beyond me). ...oh, just realized that Pippin HoSI might be to help with bidding. In that case, uh, nevermind.  My only other comment would be that if ES could find a way to squeeze in some Nice Fish, it could greatly offset the exerting Safe Passage and Follow Smeagol require.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 11, 2008, 12:08:42 PM by DáinIronfoot »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MR. Lurtzy
King
   
Offline
Formats: Fellowship; Towers Standard
Posts: 2756
My name is Wepeel
Gold: +218
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: July 11, 2008, 12:20:47 PM » |
0
|
With never, since I cannot discard smeagol, does it take away two threats for free?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DáinIronfoot
Bearded Axeman
Administrator
Maia
   
Offline
Posts: 6174
Never tickle a Dwarf!
Gold: +371
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: July 11, 2008, 12:53:28 PM » |
0
|
With never, since I cannot discard smeagol, does it take away two threats for free? I don't think so. I think ES included multiple copies because it's a free condition that can be spotted to make other cards like Gladden Homestead and Nasty as potent as possible. The only other FP  -cost  conditions are Safe Passage (already in use here), There's Another Way (ditto), and Come Away (which requires wounding a companion each time the fellowship moves). That last one reminds me of one more recommendation, though: if you use Faramir, I'd include No Stranger to the Shadows to cut down on twilight a little more. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Elendil!Urukfear
Villager
  
Offline
Posts: 238
Aragorn, son of Arathorn. High King of Gondor
Gold: +9
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: July 14, 2008, 11:53:09 AM » |
0
|
Man!!! I gotta say this deck is amazing!!!!!! I should make a hobbit and smeagol deck. I know i have the right cards anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Time What know we of this despondent thing No sign no sound no tranquil ring We try to tell its quantity yet fail to see the point Only one can know of it to this eternal joint We have not power in Use To hold this creature bay But only wait for it to change Inside the soul of it we lay
|
|
|
|
Trooper
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: July 19, 2008, 09:30:39 AM » |
0
|
I played these Solo Smeagol decks a lot and all went fine until my opponents started to add Saruman's Power in their deck. Once the conditions are gone, it's very soon game over with Gollum. But nevertheless, Solo Smeagol is fun and combine it with a Ninja Gollum Shadow. Naked Waste is so nice in that way !!!! You nearly always can pump 2x that way.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Elessar's Socks
Global Mod
Knight
   
Offline
Posts: 1370
"I see...I look foul and feel foul. Is that it?"
Gold: +116
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: July 21, 2008, 03:22:44 AM » |
0
|
Thanks for the suggestions, Dain. You're correct that Never is being used solely as a 0-cost [Smeagol] card to spot. Also once I figure out if going first or second is preferable, Pippin ought to help the bid one way or another. (All right, so that 1-cost slot was just too tempting to leave unfilled.) That said, there are some excellent field-tested decks out there if people want to see how the true experts do it! I hear Gil-Estels's version has been winning some games. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Gil-Estel
King
   
Offline
GCCG: Heije
Formats: Movie for sure, never walk the standard path
Posts: 2315
Abuser of the Force
Gold: +177
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: July 21, 2008, 03:47:23 AM » |
0
|
Well, I try the best I can ofcourse...to stay modest, I don't know whether it was due to my good deck, or the match-up. Some match-ups are horrible for solo-smeagol, others are not. I guess with solo-smeagol this is more the case than with other decks. Here is my version of solo-smeagol: *The One Ring, Such a Weight to Carry ( 7R2) *Smeagol, Bearer of Great Secrets (RB)( 9R+30) Fellowship (32) 1x *Gladden Homestead ( 13R49) 1x *Safe Passage ( 11R50) 2x Don't Look at Them ( 6R39) 1x Follow Smeagol ( 5U23) 3x Nice Fish ( 15C46) 4x Poor Wretch ( 5C27) 4x There's Another Way ( 12C40) 1x Clever Hobbits ( 7U54) 2x Nasty ( 7U64) 2x Not Listening ( 6C43) 4x One Good Turn Deserves Another ( 11U49) 3x Still Far Ahead ( 8U29) 2x Where Shall We Go ( 7U78) 1x *Deagol, Fateful Finder ( 13R46) 1x *Fishing Boat ( 13R48) Deagol is there as an extra smeagol card, and, when you don't get Fishing Boat soon enough, it will make sure you'll get fishingboat. Smeagol gets strong, manipulates the sites, with One Good turn deserves another and Still far Ahead. He is strong due to There's another way and poor wretch, so yeah I like this deck......
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
..."Elves seldom give unguarded advice, for advice is a dangerous gift, even from the wise to the wise, and all courses may run ill"...
|
|
|
|