LotR TCG Wiki → Card Sets:  All 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 → Forums:  TLHH CC

Welcome, guests!

Join our growing LotR community today and you'll get:

  • Access to special members only-forums.
  • A great way to connect and hook up with other players.
  • Removal of advertisements in the forums and wiki.
  • The ability to list cards you want to trade or sell.
  • ...And much more!
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down
Print

Author Topic: League Feedback  (Read 1218 times)
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Ringbearer
Bowman
****
Offline Offline

GCCG: RIngbearer
Gemp: Ringbearer
Formats: FOTR, TS or movie
Posts: 418


Gold: +23

« Reply #15 on: December 16, 2009, 05:14:15 PM »
0

Towers block is set 4-6 with TTT sites.
Towers standard is set 1-6 with TTT sites AND some X-listing.
Logged


ket_the_jet
Better than nothing!
Lord
******
Offline Offline

Gemp: chet_manly
Posts: 3499


Gold: +226

WWW
« Reply #16 on: December 16, 2009, 06:52:52 PM »
0

Chompers: exactly.
-wtk
Logged

chompers
Marksman
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 599


Gold: +11

« Reply #17 on: December 16, 2009, 08:48:06 PM »
0

So many formats - too many choices - I am a Libran and have trouble making up my mind

It is so much easier with the league (whatever the format may be) - someone makes my mind up for me Smiley
Logged

FM
Future Judge
Global Mod
Wizard
*****
Offline Offline

GCCG: Musco
Formats: LotR: Fellowship Block / MTG: Any format (specially Sealed)
Posts: 4023


How can you say "no"?

Gold: +264

« Reply #18 on: February 14, 2011, 08:17:12 AM »
0

Well, natural progression, wouldn't that be set 1-4, TTT sites?
Is this actually a format though? Has anyone ever played sets 1-4 before?

I have, it was called Standard, when The Two Towers first came out. Wink However, as I said, it was STANDARD, we just didn't have other sets yet, so it WOULD be Towers Standard, sets 1-6, if we were to name the format NOW. In fact, the natural progression WOULD be Towers Standard FIRST, and THEN Towers Block. You play the first block, a new set comes out, you mix and match, learn to play with the new cards, see what old ones do not work that well anymore, get acquainted to the new set, and then it's time to kiss it goodbye, so you move to Towers Block. Thn, King's Standard, so on, so forth. However, to be fair, it doesn't HAVE to be this way, in fact, you either go Block by Block or Standard by Standard. THe natural progression would be King coming in and kicking FotR out of the picture, no block involved whatsoever, but it feels smoothier (not to mention, translates into more games) this way.
Logged


Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
Print
Jump to: