|
|
ket_the_jet
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: March 25, 2010, 09:42:20 AM » |
 0
|
11, 12, 13. No different than any other set block...the base set and its two expansions.
-wtk
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Gil-Estel
King
 Offline
GCCG: Heije
Formats: Movie for sure, never walk the standard path
Posts: 2315
Abuser of the Force
Gold: +177
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: March 25, 2010, 11:56:22 AM » |
0
|
And it is crap....hahaha. Very difficult to even build a decent deck. Same goes with Return of the King block, bah, very annoying to make a deck in those formats.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
..."Elves seldom give unguarded advice, for advice is a dangerous gift, even from the wise to the wise, and all courses may run ill"...
|
|
|
Witchkingx5
Knight
Offline
Formats: Movie, Standard
Posts: 1173
I will crush all of you...
Gold: +55
|
|
« Reply #3 on: March 26, 2010, 02:41:24 PM » |
0
|
Which Promos can be used? If Anarion is legal, I'll come up with maybe the best possible deck in War of the RIng Block! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Witchkingx5
Knight
Offline
Formats: Movie, Standard
Posts: 1173
I will crush all of you...
Gold: +55
|
|
« Reply #5 on: March 26, 2010, 02:52:51 PM » |
0
|
Ah, #$&*@!, that ruins my whole Deck idea...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jdizzy001
Ranger
Offline
GCCG: Jdizzy001
Formats: Movie, Casual
Posts: 874
Gold: +64
|
|
« Reply #6 on: March 26, 2010, 07:08:28 PM » |
0
|
Is there a format which uses sets 11-19 exclusively
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MR. Lurtzy
King
Offline
Formats: Fellowship; Towers Standard
Posts: 2756
My name is Wepeel
Gold: +218
|
|
« Reply #7 on: March 26, 2010, 07:26:15 PM » |
0
|
No, but you can always make one of those in Casual.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jdizzy001
Ranger
Offline
GCCG: Jdizzy001
Formats: Movie, Casual
Posts: 874
Gold: +64
|
|
« Reply #8 on: March 27, 2010, 01:48:26 PM » |
0
|
i think maybe i will
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Gil-Estel
King
Offline
GCCG: Heije
Formats: Movie for sure, never walk the standard path
Posts: 2315
Abuser of the Force
Gold: +177
|
|
« Reply #9 on: March 28, 2010, 12:11:03 AM » |
0
|
Is there a format which uses sets 11-19 exclusively
It kinda makes sense, since those are the sets that have new sites. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
..."Elves seldom give unguarded advice, for advice is a dangerous gift, even from the wise to the wise, and all courses may run ill"...
|
|
|
Witchkingx5
Knight
Offline
Formats: Movie, Standard
Posts: 1173
I will crush all of you...
Gold: +55
|
|
« Reply #10 on: March 28, 2010, 11:22:44 AM » |
0
|
I agree, when I came back to LotR a couple of months ago, I was wondering why RotK with all it's different mechanics is legal in Standard, but the lack of new expansions did make Standard a formtat where the two different "generations" overlap with each other...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jdizzy001
Ranger
Offline
GCCG: Jdizzy001
Formats: Movie, Casual
Posts: 874
Gold: +64
|
|
« Reply #11 on: March 28, 2010, 04:03:14 PM » |
0
|
Yeah, we should start a new format. 11-19, we can call it War of the Ring II or something else so as not to confuse it with the War of the Ring Block format. Or better yet, since the War of the Ring block seems to be disliked so much, lets expand it to include sets 14-19. Any takers?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Gwaihir
Scout
Offline
Posts: 94
Gold: +3
|
|
« Reply #12 on: March 28, 2010, 06:17:50 PM » |
0
|
I would suggest "What was Decipher Thinking Block" as a good name for blocks 11-19. Or you could go with the more concise "Mistake Block".
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 28, 2010, 06:23:10 PM by Gwaihir »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sharkey
Guest
|
|
« Reply #13 on: March 28, 2010, 06:43:27 PM » |
0
|
It was almost good. With better support, it would have worked.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jdizzy001
Ranger
Offline
GCCG: Jdizzy001
Formats: Movie, Casual
Posts: 874
Gold: +64
|
|
« Reply #14 on: March 28, 2010, 09:22:45 PM » |
0
|
what are you talking about!? Sets 11-19 were great what with the addition of resistence and, and, um.... followers? seriously, I really liked set 11. G for Grand was a great card. Maybe by expanding the block to include all 9 sets of second genreation cards we'll find out the block wasn't that bad. Despite that, I think "what was decipher thinking" would be a great block name... jk. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
