|
Shieldmaiden
|
 |
« on: July 29, 2008, 01:08:18 PM » |
 0
|
So here I was, going through my cards because I was negotiating a trade, when I came across something strange. A guy has asked me for a Ulaire Otsea, Lieutenant Of Morgul foil. When I looked it up on Kralik's site, it also was listed and pictured the same as what the guy asked for, Ulaire Otsea. I noted the card number, 1U235, and I fetched the card from my stacks o' trades. It reads Ulaire O stea, Lieutenant Of Morgul. I have looked at my cards in my collection folder, and both my foil and non-foil versions say Ostea. So what's going on? I apologise if this is something that is already common knowledge. I've only just discovered it, and I'm wondering what to do with this trade.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TheJord
League Director
Administrator
King
 Offline
GCCG: TheJord
Formats: Standard
Posts: 2365
High King of Rules
Gold: +138
|
|
« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2008, 01:10:04 PM » |
0
|
This was a typo which was pointed out in the CRD.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"The rule of Gondor is mine!"
|
|
|
|
Shieldmaiden
|
|
« Reply #2 on: July 29, 2008, 01:19:10 PM » |
0
|
Thanks for answering so quickly TJ! So are there some cards that are Otsea, and some that are Ostea, or are they all Ostea? The reason why I ask is because the picture of the card 1U235 for Kralik's database shows a card with Otsea. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DáinIronfoot
Bearded Axeman
Administrator
Maia
Offline
Posts: 6174
Never tickle a Dwarf!
Gold: +371
|
|
« Reply #3 on: July 29, 2008, 01:23:41 PM » |
0
|
That was the only one that was in error. Other Otseas are correctly named. The funny this is that both SdA and the Decklist Builder have 1U235 listed as Ostea.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Shieldmaiden
|
|
« Reply #4 on: July 29, 2008, 01:30:41 PM » |
0
|
I'm sorry, I should have been clearer with my question. Are all 1U235 cards Osteas? Or are there some that are Osteas and some that are Otseas? I went through other sets, and they all seem to be Otseas. I'm just wondering about FotR. The reason why I'm going on about this is because I want to make a fair trade with this guy. I don't want to send him an Ostea if he's expecting an Otsea. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DáinIronfoot
Bearded Axeman
Administrator
Maia
Offline
Posts: 6174
Never tickle a Dwarf!
Gold: +371
|
|
« Reply #5 on: July 29, 2008, 01:37:14 PM » |
0
|
Ah...that I don't know. Decipher's website picture actually has it as "Ostea": http://lotrtcg.fanhq.com/TCG/Card.aspx?gameID=7&cardID=1343I have a box full of FotR cards at home, so I'll check and see what that shows if nobody else says more before then.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Shieldmaiden
|
|
« Reply #6 on: July 29, 2008, 01:38:58 PM » |
0
|
Aw, thanks Dain! for you now, and another later.  You're so kind. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DáinIronfoot
Bearded Axeman
Administrator
Maia
Offline
Posts: 6174
Never tickle a Dwarf!
Gold: +371
|
|
« Reply #7 on: July 29, 2008, 01:39:48 PM » |
0
|
Just doing my civic duty, Ms. Maiden.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kralik
The Grey Pilgrim
Administrator
King
Offline
GCCG: Kralik
Gemp: Kralik
Formats: Fellowship, Towers, TS, Movie
Posts: 2168
Gold: +283
|
|
« Reply #9 on: July 29, 2008, 02:27:45 PM » |
0
|
Malachi is right... the only physical cards printed are Osteas. I edited the card image per the erratum. Another example is Bilbo, Retired Adventurer (actually Bilbo Baggins, Retired Adventurer). EDIT: Notes in the DB for Otsea read: Card title and game text are errata. Image fix by Kralik. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 29, 2008, 02:30:24 PM by Kralik »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Shieldmaiden
|
|
« Reply #10 on: July 30, 2008, 10:23:17 AM » |
0
|
That's great, thanks guys! Now I can go for the trade with confidence.  for Malachi and Kralik. I guess I should have checked the notes, though, lol.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Elendil!Urukfear
Villager
Offline
Posts: 238
Aragorn, son of Arathorn. High King of Gondor
Gold: +9
|
|
« Reply #11 on: August 18, 2008, 06:19:46 PM » |
0
|
Whoah! I'm so sorry to interupt, but i just had the biggest blond moment of blond moments (though I am not blond, lol!). I was looking over your first paragraph and I was like, wait a minute what's the difference between otsea and otsea they are exactly the same. Of course I was speed reading so it made that big of a difference. Wow... that was totally weird, and funny, though I may be the only one to think so.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Time
What know we of this despondent thing
No sign no sound no tranquil ring
We try to tell its quantity
yet fail to see the point
Only one can know of it
to this eternal joint
We have not power in Use
To hold this creature bay
But only wait for it to change
Inside the soul of it we lay
|
|
|
|
|
|
CarpeGuitarrem
|
|
« Reply #13 on: August 19, 2008, 12:11:46 PM » |
0
|
Lol. No, I get it. That's funny.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TheJord
League Director
Administrator
King
Offline
GCCG: TheJord
Formats: Standard
Posts: 2365
High King of Rules
Gold: +138
|
|
« Reply #14 on: August 19, 2008, 03:46:42 PM » |
0
|
2 previous posts = SPAM
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"The rule of Gondor is mine!"
|
|
|
|
