Gartax
Scout

Offline
Posts: 77
Gold: +4
|
 |
« on: July 06, 2011, 09:58:19 AM » |
0
|
Hi there, me and my friends have devellope a special format base on the expended one, but more friendly. I wish to get some feedback from you and if you have some advice it will be appreciated. The Goal:Our goal was to design a format that allows us to play as many cards as possible and built as many competitive deck as possible. We wish to have as few "Master" (like mountain troll swarm) deck as possible in order to enjoy the diversity in its fullest. In the light of our goal wich card should we ban or put on a watch list? We also have a special rule:Site path: When building your site path, you can choose between 2 sites pools. Standard site pool and Movie Block site pool. If you choose the Movie Block site pool, you can choose site from any sets. The sites keep their site numbers. So you cannot have more than one site 1, one site 2 etc. Also they kept their twilight cost number, but loose the region penalty. Finally, the site number 4 have a twilight cost penalty of +3 and the site 7 have a twilight cost of +2. Also note that the TT Cavern Entrance has the same text as the Standard one. So here are our X-list 1C9 Dwarven Axe1R45 Galadriel, Lady of Light 1R80 Ottar, Man of Laketown 1U108 No Stranger to the Shadows 1C311 Sam, Son of Hamfast 1R139 Savagery to Match Their Numbers 1R195 Relics of Moria 1U234 Úlairë Nertëa, Messenger of Dol Guldur 1C248 Forces of Mordor 1C138 Saruman's Snows 1R308 Power according to his stature1U316 A Talent for Not Being Seen 2P121 Gimli, Dwarf of the Mountain-race 2C14 Till Durin Wakes again2C30 Deep in thought2R75 Bill Ferny 3R38 Aragorn, Heir to the White City 3R42 Horn of Boromir 3R67 The Palantír of Orthanc 3R68 Saruman, Keeper of Isengard3R113 Shire countryside 3U106 Bill the Pony 3C108 Frying Pan 4R73 Legolas, Dauntless Hunter 4U276 Fortress Never Fallen 4R304 Get On and Get Away 7C23 Into The West7U49 Steadfast Champion 8C1 Aggression 10U2 Memories of Darkness 10R104 Birthday Present10R11 Galadriel, Lady Redeemed10C91 Mordor Fiend 11C31 Final Account 11R100 Strange Looking men11U114 Demoralize 11C132 Orkish Smith13U188 Courtyard Parapet15R55 Aragorn Torongil 15R72 Bill Ferny 15R64 Madril Defender of Osgiliath15R86 Mumak Commander15R112 Mountain Troll15R154 Second Breakfast17S7 Elven Guardian17U10 Namarie 17U14 Weapons of Lothlorien17R24 Shadowfax, Greatest of the Mearas17R36 Throne of Minas tirith17U58 Soldier Cache 17R89 Relentless Warg18R11 Galadriel's Sylver Ewer 18R17 Gil-Galad, High-king of the Noldor 18R29 Deceit18R32 Not Easily Avoided18R38 Aragorn, heir to the throne 18R50 Faitfull stone 18R85 Gothmog, Morgul leader18R96 Ekerbrand's horn 18R100 Gamling's Horn18U110 Prized LaganSelf-Made Errata 1R90 Aragorn's bowAt the start of the Archery phase instead of Archery: 15R56 Aragorn's Bow, Ranger's LongbowAt the start of the Archery phase instead of Archery: 15U102 Black land OverlordRemove 2 threats 15R172 Ugluk, Ugly FellowHe does not exert at the start of the skirmish. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NappyKorn
Knight
   
Offline
GCCG: Nappy
Formats: Standard, Expanded and Movie Block
Posts: 1263
The ShizKnight
Gold: +212
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2011, 10:09:28 AM » |
0
|
Woot, like having the original x-list and errata wasn't enough now we have this HUGE list to worry about, LOL. All I can say is I can't remember errata and x-lists that decipher published when making a deck so I would have to aviod this format if it comes to pass.
NK
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If a Balrog falls from a bridge and noone is around, does it make a sound?
|
|
|
Gartax
Scout

Offline
Posts: 77
Gold: +4
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: July 06, 2011, 10:44:11 AM » |
0
|
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 06, 2011, 10:49:13 AM by Gartax »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
macheteman
Knight
   
Offline
GCCG: machete
Formats: movie and towers standard
Posts: 1869
Gold: +194
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: July 06, 2011, 11:00:43 AM » |
0
|
i also would never use this format. deep in thought? really? saruman's snows? its like you took all the cards you didn't like playing against and banned them. i mean really, banning saruman's snows and deep in thought are not helping reach your goal of playing "as many cards as possible." let me clarify by saying that if you and your friends enjoy the game more by using this "format" then that is great and good for LOTR TCG. however i doubt that many (if any) forum members would enjoy playing by these rules.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ringbearer
Bowman
  
Offline
GCCG: RIngbearer
Gemp: Ringbearer
Formats: FOTR, TS or movie
Posts: 418
Gold: +23
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: July 06, 2011, 11:02:58 AM » |
0
|
I wouldnt. For above reasons. It looks like a list saying: we lose a lot tot his card, so we ban it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Gartax
Scout

Offline
Posts: 77
Gold: +4
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: July 06, 2011, 12:06:26 PM » |
0
|
saruman snows was already ban by decipher we just did not ask ourself if we kept it or not deep in thought with follower is just plain stupid (tranfert palendo had 2 pool transfert alatar had 2 pool and so on, play deep in thought discard all shadow condition) AS for loosing to those card that we ban, we just ban the card that we judge was vastly overpower compare to previous card already made. You had to keep in mind that we wish to play all the old shadow culture and the older freep strategies. That way we could keep the game entertainning and fresh. Not always playing the same cards again and again. Exemple: Aragorn THorongil, in a standar format that card is strong, nothing more. In my format, where you wish to see diversity, Aragorn Thorongil will see 90-95% of game play compare to the other Aragorn. Just as a side note, I am note trying to convert anyone into playing this format, I was just asking for feedback and or advice as to how to improve it.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 07, 2011, 06:33:44 AM by Gartax »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Thranduil
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: July 06, 2011, 01:37:48 PM » |
0
|
I think it's great that there are still people working on making the game better for them and their player groups. If you don't agree, that's fine—don't use their ideas. I do think that being automatically and unnecessarily negative about it is not helping anyone.
@Gartax: Maybe you could post a few of the more powerful decks you and your friends have been playing to give us more a sense of what this format looks like?
Thran
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NappyKorn
Knight
   
Offline
GCCG: Nappy
Formats: Standard, Expanded and Movie Block
Posts: 1263
The ShizKnight
Gold: +212
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: July 06, 2011, 03:45:48 PM » |
0
|
Yeah don't get me wrong guys, it is a great idea people are still finding new and creative ways to keep the game fresh. Asw I said though my memory is crap as I didn't even notice he has the original x-list included in his. I have a hard time remebering those cards and the errata that decipher added so just my mind can't add more to this. I'd be willing to give anything a try, but don't be surprised if I drop a card in this format that is 'banned' from time to time.
NK
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If a Balrog falls from a bridge and noone is around, does it make a sound?
|
|
|
Gartax
Scout

Offline
Posts: 77
Gold: +4
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: July 07, 2011, 06:34:40 AM » |
0
|
I will post some of the deck I can remember being powerfull, it will be hard because we play about 20 deck each...
Probably this evening!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Doom
Troll
 
Offline
GCCG: DOOM
Formats: Standard/Expanded
Posts: 150
Master of Doom, by Doom mastered. (AKA doomkitty)
Gold: +84
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: July 08, 2011, 11:32:29 AM » |
0
|
The Goal:Our goal was to design a format that allows us to play as many cards as possible and built as many competitive deck as possible. We wish to have as few "Master" (like mountain troll swarm) deck as possible in order to enjoy the diversity in its fullest. Honestly, as previously said, you really aren't helping to "play as many cards as possible". Dwarven Axe? Faithful Stone? (Card already has errata that lets the shadow player prevent this by removing (2). I think a better "format" would just be to play expanded, and have a mutual rule with your friends to not use any utterly broken decks (fruit loops, horn).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leokula
Ranger
   
Offline
GCCG: leokula
Formats: Expanded and Standard
Posts: 834
Gold: +77
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: July 08, 2011, 11:47:02 AM » |
-3
|
I love to see Dwarven Axe here, that's probably one of the most abused LOTR cards.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Doom
Troll
 
Offline
GCCG: DOOM
Formats: Standard/Expanded
Posts: 150
Master of Doom, by Doom mastered. (AKA doomkitty)
Gold: +84
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: July 08, 2011, 12:46:18 PM » |
0
|
honestly, if dwarven axe is that broken, then probably half of the cards in LOTR TCG should be on the x-list.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
macheteman
Knight
   
Offline
GCCG: machete
Formats: movie and towers standard
Posts: 1869
Gold: +194
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: July 08, 2011, 12:55:36 PM » |
0
|
dwarven axe is somewhat NPE. but it should NEVER be banned. its the dwarven bread and butter.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Doom
Troll
 
Offline
GCCG: DOOM
Formats: Standard/Expanded
Posts: 150
Master of Doom, by Doom mastered. (AKA doomkitty)
Gold: +84
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: July 08, 2011, 01:04:35 PM » |
0
|
Exactly ^^
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leokula
Ranger
   
Offline
GCCG: leokula
Formats: Expanded and Standard
Posts: 834
Gold: +77
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: July 08, 2011, 02:17:57 PM » |
0
|
It's not broken, it's just been abused. Mind you nobody in the game has free possessions that give them +2 and an ability. That card only exists because it was designed in a set where dwarves were so weak that it was balanced. Just compare it to the other axes released after reflections.
I'm not saying I don't play it, but it's cool to see someone not playing it because it's clearly unfair.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|