retireddevil
Neekerbreeker
Offline
GCCG: retireddevil
Formats: Openish
Posts: 3
Gold: 0
|
 |
« on: January 23, 2012, 12:27:49 PM » |
0
|
Im playing in a sealed deck/draft next week with my local playing group. The starters we are using have had all the random rares removed. so we are allowed to each bring 3 rares from the Fellowship Set. My first thought was Lurtz, Savagery, and Troop of Uruk-hai purely for stopping power. So i thought it would be a fun topic, if you could only have 3 rares from fellowship, what would they be? (or actually just any 3 cards in the game to play with in a sealed pool)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
legolas3333
King
   
Offline
GCCG: L3333
Formats: Movie Block, Standard
Posts: 2184
Gold: +130
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2012, 01:03:59 PM » |
0
|
Greenleaf, and either Morgul Hunter x2 or Troop Of Uruk-Hai x2; depending on my mood.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
A Promo Saved is a Promo Earned
If the Balrog gets a toothpick, the Watcher deserves a spork. ~ Elessar's Armpits
|
|
|
Arcanite
Scout

Offline
Formats: Movie
Posts: 84
Gold: 0
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2012, 01:40:30 PM » |
0
|
Greenleaf, Aragorn HttwC, Tower Assassin Splashable, and can go in any deck! (Fellowship) Legolas DH for Towers, He's just too good if you get the gorn deck, as opposing decks are likely to be event/possession heavy.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 23, 2012, 01:42:06 PM by Arcanite »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jcb213
Troll
 
Offline
GCCG: jcb213
Formats: Movie
Posts: 158
Gold: +29
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2012, 02:44:53 PM » |
+1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ket_the_jet
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2012, 04:25:11 PM » |
0
|
I've got to go with those three as well. -wtk
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ringbearer
Bowman
  
Offline
GCCG: RIngbearer
Gemp: Ringbearer
Formats: FOTR, TS or movie
Posts: 418
Gold: +23
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: January 25, 2012, 08:28:56 AM » |
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leokula
Ranger
   
Offline
GCCG: leokula
Formats: Expanded and Standard
Posts: 834
Gold: +77
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: January 26, 2012, 11:36:13 AM » |
0
|
When I first read the thread, first card that instantly came to mind was Aragorn, ROTN. Thinking about it it's hard indeed not to go with Greenleaf, Aragorn, ROTN and Sting. I thought maybe Arwen, DOE instead of Greenleaf, as I'm usually afraid of Nazguls, but I don't know.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
hsiale
Villager
  
Offline
Gemp: hsiale
Posts: 280
Gold: +16
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: January 26, 2012, 11:56:02 AM » |
0
|
RotN or Greenleaf could be good. But I see no point of Sting. You will not have a true choke deck and removing some twilight will not help that much, on the other hand vitality of your ringbearer is much more valuable (as he skirmishes more often and you bid higher) in sealed deck playing. Hobbit Sword is nearly as good as Sting and Frying Pan is way better (and is a common from a small set so chances you get it are not bad). If you want an anti-Orc card, Greatest Kingdom of My People is way better, maybe together with Gimli, Son of Gloin (although chances of getting Gimli, Farin or Fror are quite good anyway). Arwen, DoE is not useful in sealed deck, no starter contains Nazgul and they are all U or R, so they will not be played often. Arwen, Elven Rider is far better (as you never have enough vitality on your ring-bearer, especially as even 3 wounds on him are risky, as you may get hit by Isengard Warrior's regroup action).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
FM
Future Judge
Global Mod
Wizard
   
Offline
GCCG: Musco
Formats: LotR: Fellowship Block / MTG: Any format (specially Sealed)
Posts: 4023
How can you say "no"?
Gold: +264
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: January 26, 2012, 12:14:00 PM » |
0
|
It's sealed. Sting let's you see their hand and know what's up, which is invaluable information on a Limited environment where decks could have pretty much anything and it'd still be playable. I'd have to go with Greenleaf, ROTN and Sting as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Anautikus
Ranger
   
Offline
GCCG: Anautikus
Formats: Movie, Blocks, Expanded
Posts: 934
Life isn't a dress rehearsal.
Gold: +181
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: January 27, 2012, 03:18:18 AM » |
0
|
I'd switch Sting...for the Ring. haha Isildur's Bane could be handy in a pinch, you never know! Well okay, I guess with Sting you would know...but I'm still going with the Ring! (In addition to Greenleaf and Aragorn, RotN  )
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Do yourself a favor; never try to send a grappling hook through the post office." Trade List
|
|
|
leokula
Ranger
   
Offline
GCCG: leokula
Formats: Expanded and Standard
Posts: 834
Gold: +77
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: January 27, 2012, 03:24:25 AM » |
0
|
RotN or Greenleaf could be good. But I see no point of Sting. You will not have a true choke deck and removing some twilight will not help that much, on the other hand vitality of your ringbearer is much more valuable (as he skirmishes more often and you bid higher) in sealed deck playing. Hobbit Sword is nearly as good as Sting and Frying Pan is way better (and is a common from a small set so chances you get it are not bad). If you want an anti-Orc card, Greatest Kingdom of My People is way better, maybe together with Gimli, Son of Gloin (although chances of getting Gimli, Farin or Fror are quite good anyway). Arwen, DoE is not useful in sealed deck, no starter contains Nazgul and they are all U or R, so they will not be played often. Arwen, Elven Rider is far better (as you never have enough vitality on your ring-bearer, especially as even 3 wounds on him are risky, as you may get hit by Isengard Warrior's regroup action). Actually Arwen, Elven Rider, Isengard Warrior and Frying Pan are all Realms of the Elf Lords.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
macheteman
Knight
   
Offline
GCCG: machete
Formats: movie and towers standard
Posts: 1869
Gold: +194
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: January 29, 2012, 08:41:27 PM » |
+1
|
guys guys guys, i think you are all forgetting weight of a legacy!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ringbearer
Bowman
  
Offline
GCCG: RIngbearer
Gemp: Ringbearer
Formats: FOTR, TS or movie
Posts: 418
Gold: +23
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: January 30, 2012, 07:15:45 AM » |
0
|
guys guys guys, i think you are all forgetting weight of a legacy!
I didnt forget it, I just dont play broken cards.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leokula
Ranger
   
Offline
GCCG: leokula
Formats: Expanded and Standard
Posts: 834
Gold: +77
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: January 30, 2012, 08:31:27 AM » |
0
|
guys guys guys, i think you are all forgetting weight of a legacy!
I didnt forget it, I just dont play broken cards. Agreed, i think we all have a little ethics here  .
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|