0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Maneuver: Spot a Nazgul to wound Gandalf twice. The Free Peoples player may discard two cards from hand to prevent this.
I am against such a poll as you shouldnt anyone letting it enter, becasue it will just be whomever shouts the most will get an agreement, or just people voting for what they will like.I can tell from my DGMA days that it prevents the action.
While I don't object to the poll, I am going to assert that it will not be binding, regardless of how the poll turns out. How many people here really read, know and understand the rules and their subtle nuances to the extent required to make a decision on this?
Quote from: Ringbearer on February 09, 2015, 07:02:21 AMI am against such a poll as you shouldnt anyone letting it enter, becasue it will just be whomever shouts the most will get an agreement, or just people voting for what they will like.I can tell from my DGMA days that it prevents the action.Please enlighten the community then. So far there is no actual proof from the rules or otherwise that it's not talking about wounds being prevented (whether in the context of the action being stopped or not). All we've seen so far is mostly conjecture, however logical.
Quote from: dmaz on February 09, 2015, 08:24:24 AMQuote from: Ringbearer on February 09, 2015, 07:02:21 AMI am against such a poll as you shouldnt anyone letting it enter, becasue it will just be whomever shouts the most will get an agreement, or just people voting for what they will like.I can tell from my DGMA days that it prevents the action.Please enlighten the community then. So far there is no actual proof from the rules or otherwise that it's not talking about wounds being prevented (whether in the context of the action being stopped or not). All we've seen so far is mostly conjecture, however logical.I dont have a rule example but a ruling that kept with me was about Too Great And Terrible, lady Redeemed and Stewards Tomb (ROTK). Apparently it cancels the effect, so it was ruled during a Premier Series.
Tournament directors don't always make the right call.
I think I am not quite understanding what you mean. Even if it were to discard 2 cards in order to negate the card itself, it would still prevent the wounds. The card would also be discarded because its an event, so it cant be re-used. You would still have to discard the two cards so negating the card part would be useless. I would say either way works. It doesn't really matter.
I dont have a rule example but a ruling that kept with me was about Too Great And Terrible, lady Redeemed and Stewards Tomb (ROTK). Apparently it cancels the effect, so it was ruled during a Premier Series.