LotR TCG Wiki → Card Sets:  All 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 → Forums:  TLHH CC

Author Topic: Namarie (POLL)  (Read 62191 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

May 14, 2009, 01:42:12 PM
Reply #15

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: Namarie (POLL)
« Reply #15 on: May 14, 2009, 01:42:12 PM »
It should be R-listed, not banned.

May 14, 2009, 02:11:41 PM
Reply #16

Kralik

  • Guest
Re: Namarie (POLL)
« Reply #16 on: May 14, 2009, 02:11:41 PM »
Maybe the poll should be changed to the options:

-X-list
-R-list
-Neither

If you only had one copy it'd still be quite powerful, but you'd have to draw it and it can't be replaced with Gil-Galad as easily.

May 14, 2009, 02:12:34 PM
Reply #17

Gil-Estel

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2267
  • Abuser of the Force
Re: Namarie (POLL)
« Reply #17 on: May 14, 2009, 02:12:34 PM »
Ban Gil-Galad please.....
..."Elves seldom give unguarded advice, for advice is a dangerous gift, even from the wise to the wise, and all courses may run ill"...

May 14, 2009, 02:13:17 PM
Reply #18

Kralik

  • Guest
Re: Namarie (POLL)
« Reply #18 on: May 14, 2009, 02:13:17 PM »
Ban Gil-Galad please.....

*snifffffff* :'(

May 14, 2009, 02:15:39 PM
Reply #19

Gil-Estel

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2267
  • Abuser of the Force
Re: Namarie (POLL)
« Reply #19 on: May 14, 2009, 02:15:39 PM »
Sorry Kralik ;) didn't mean to dissapoint you :(
..."Elves seldom give unguarded advice, for advice is a dangerous gift, even from the wise to the wise, and all courses may run ill"...

May 14, 2009, 02:39:07 PM
Reply #20

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: Namarie (POLL)
« Reply #20 on: May 14, 2009, 02:39:07 PM »
What about an errata?

May 14, 2009, 02:56:22 PM
Reply #21

Foresight

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Marksman
  • Posts: 589
  • Hunting your kind down...
    • Myspace
Re: Namarie (POLL)
« Reply #21 on: May 14, 2009, 02:56:22 PM »
What about an errata?

Make it unique. :D
Like a force of nature, the Uruks are Unstoppable. [Uruk]

May 14, 2009, 03:06:01 PM
Reply #22

Kralik

  • Guest
Re: Namarie (POLL)
« Reply #22 on: May 14, 2009, 03:06:01 PM »

May 14, 2009, 03:19:04 PM
Reply #23

Elrohir

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Marksman
  • Posts: 575
  • If you want him, come and claim him!
    • Elrohir wants some cards
Re: Namarie (POLL)
« Reply #23 on: May 14, 2009, 03:19:04 PM »
It is a strange fate that we should suffer so much fear and doubt over so a small card.

Changeing Austria Format is the wrong way! I am absolutely against changing this Format. As it depends on Standard Format, we should change the standard Ruling for Namarie. According to this, Austria Format gets it new rules, and it is still clear.

Elven Supplies need the tokens of Namarie!

So, my suggestions for Namarie are (not detailed, but I am sure you understand what I mean):
1) Add a [Elven] token here for each  [Elven] hunter you can spot.
OR
2) Discard this or remove two [Elven] tokens here and spot an [Elven] hunter, to discard a condition.

To sum up: Do not change Austria Format X-List! It has to be the same as Standard!! So, if People decide to edit anything, then it should be done for Standard!

Ban Gil-Galad please.....
I like the R+ one much more than the new one.

Elrohir

PS: Shadow Conditions are not meant to stay in play if they are facing  [Gandalf] or [Elven] culture!

Had a game recenly where my opponent had 2 Namarie out with 5 Hunter companions. Each regroup he used Gil-Galad to play from discard 2-3 Elven Marksmanship and 1-2 Take up the Bow, then replay Namarie itself. So, even without the Faithful Stone almost none of my minions ever get to skirmish, not to mention my conditions.
This makes Sting of Shelob, Unseen Foe... pretty playable!

« Last Edit: May 14, 2009, 03:28:18 PM by Elrohir »
You gave away your life's grace. I cannot protect you anymore.

May 14, 2009, 03:19:34 PM
Reply #24

FingolfinFinwe

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Marksman
  • Posts: 507
Re: Namarie (POLL)
« Reply #24 on: May 14, 2009, 03:19:34 PM »
In a perfect world both Namarie and Gil-Galad would get an errata, but since errata is definitely something to avoid for simplicity sake restriction/banning is more in line.  I think Namarie has to at least be restricted.

May 14, 2009, 03:48:59 PM
Reply #25

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: Namarie (POLL)
« Reply #25 on: May 14, 2009, 03:48:59 PM »
I fully agree with Elrohir.

May 14, 2009, 06:10:12 PM
Reply #26

FingolfinFinwe

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Marksman
  • Posts: 507
Re: Namarie (POLL)
« Reply #26 on: May 14, 2009, 06:10:12 PM »
I agree that it would be best if Namarie were restricted in Standard (which would affect Austrian).

May 14, 2009, 10:17:04 PM
Reply #27

SomeRandomDude

  • ********
  • Information Offline
  • Maia
  • Posts: 7004
  • Most Likely To Usurp Kralik and Dáin
    • My Wordpress
Re: Namarie (POLL)
« Reply #27 on: May 14, 2009, 10:17:04 PM »
We can't change standard. We don't have a PC and big D ain't doing anything anytime soon.

I think the optimal idea is banning Gil-Galad because he's the broken part of the combo, not Namarie, but that idea will never fly so I guess Namarie's gotta go.
NB- 4 year veteran of CC/TLHH

"It was like:
Kralik: "What hath God wrought"
NB: "I dunno, but I'm in ur house eating ur food.""
-Elessar's Socks

Trade List- ft. Aragorn, Defender of Rohan

May 15, 2009, 01:09:04 AM
Reply #28

King89

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Horseman
  • Posts: 322
  • your master.
    • nine-walkers 2.0 german
Re: Namarie (POLL)
« Reply #28 on: May 15, 2009, 01:09:04 AM »
i guess we will play with namarie x-listed in austria format, independent how this poll will finish. although it looks really good. :up:

May 15, 2009, 01:11:34 AM
Reply #29

MuadDib85

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Ranger
  • Posts: 940
Re: Namarie (POLL)
« Reply #29 on: May 15, 2009, 01:11:34 AM »
IMO hunter elves ares strong enough without namarie, so for those people who must use gil-galad, there are still plenty of other token cards.

Namarie is way too overpowered. Should definately be banned.  Elves also have some other nice condition removal, so the only thing that is to be lost with Namarie X-listed is the broken combo of destroying any condition based shadow decks.

I have never played Austrian format but it looks interesting, from my experience playing standard format, games are alot more fun (and more even) without namarie involved.