The Last Homely House

Middle-Earth => Lothlórien => Movie => Topic started by: Enola on February 04, 2009, 02:46:58 PM

Title: Turbo Corrupt
Post by: Enola on February 04, 2009, 02:46:58 PM
Shadow Draw Deck

3x   2R84   • Úlaire Nelya, Ringwraith in Twilight
3x   3U86   • Úlaire Otsea, Ringwraith in Twilight
4x   2U78   It Wants to be Found
4x   10R68   • Úlaire Enquea, Thrall of The One
3x   8R67   Between Nazgul and Prey
2x   9R+47   • Ithil Stone
1x   1R279   • Thin and Stretched
1x   2R90     • Tower Assassin
4x   1U258   Morgul Skulker
4x   10U97   The Ring Is Mine!
2x   6C108   Wisp of Pale Sheen

Shadow Total   31


There are 3 parts in this deck :

- Twilight Nazguls using It Wants to be Found,

- Enquea TOTO with BNAP

- and a Sauron part to bring the Nazgul cards back in the draw deck and add some additional burdens with The Ring Is Mine!,
we can also use • Thin and Stretched with Enquea


That's all ;),
Title: Re: Turbo Corrupt
Post by: GloinTheDark on February 04, 2009, 06:14:35 PM
My thought is that it'll be hard to play Thin and Stretched because you only have 4 morgul skulkers, but it is a lean deck and you can draw cards with Ithil Stone.  I'd also be afraid of The Ring is mine getting caught in your hand.

Definitely test it a few times, and shuffle it up a lot to see if you can get a bad minion draw, then evaluate how good it is at its worst.
Title: Re: Turbo Corrupt
Post by: Enola on February 05, 2009, 12:31:16 AM
Lol this is probably one of the most powerful corrupt deck in Movie Block.....


This Shadow must be played with a good cycling Freeps, and 4 Skulkers are sufficients in 31 cards, it has been testing many times,

don't forget you easily add burdens in Manoeuver ;).
Title: Re: Turbo Corrupt
Post by: FM on February 05, 2009, 07:04:45 AM
I still say math dictates 4 The Ring is Mine! PLUS Thin and Stretched with only 4 Morgul Skulkers will eventually screw you. I'd consider a Tower Assassin, nice "splash" minion, good enough effect depending on what you're up against and reasonable body that allows for playing those with more ease. Probably over a sincle The Ring is Mine!. I think it'd give you more reliable odds of getting to play the cards in the right order to corrupt. But that's about it (MAYBE cut a BNaP, but I don't think it's necessary, it's still useful with the other Nazgul, unless you want a singleton Blade Tip for Otsea's text).
Title: Re: Turbo Corrupt
Post by: Not a Zombie on February 06, 2009, 09:39:47 AM
I'd replace ostea with equina, more useful 2U83
Title: Re: Turbo Corrupt
Post by: GloinTheDark on February 06, 2009, 09:53:24 AM
Yeah, but you cant get rid of 4x   10R68   • Úlaire Enquea, Thrall of The One.  That's the key to the deck.  I think he uses Nelya, and Otsea because they are cheaper.  Thus he can play It wants to be found. 

It feels like it needs 2 more wisps of pale sheen or 2 more [Sauron] Orcs if it could spare the room.
Title: Re: Turbo Corrupt
Post by: Imrahil on February 26, 2009, 01:18:27 PM
You could add a couple Spied From Above to play Wisps in regroup and discard for more burdens
Title: Re: Turbo Corrupt
Post by: Vroengard on March 04, 2009, 03:22:00 AM
you will get a real problem when you draw bad, most decks have alternatives against these cases.....you should pack the witch-king, lord of the nazgul and throw out the useless otsea, i know many versions from twilight guls, and play them by myself...without the witchi, they are always half power
Title: Re: Turbo Corrupt
Post by: Enola on March 04, 2009, 10:54:08 AM
The twilight Nazguls I use are cheaper, so you can play a Sauron minion to add burdens.

This deck has to be in 30-31 cards to draw the good card at the good moment ;).
Title: Re: Turbo Corrupt
Post by: Smeagollum on March 06, 2009, 03:29:36 AM
Uhm actually it can be faster: Put in a Sauron's throne, a Undead of Angmar and a Mount doom....
It will give resistance -4. I even wouldn't use the Wisp of Pale Sheen but 4x Morgul brute...  and 4x  Covetous Wisp. If they don't assign you'll have a pomp of 4!

3x   2R84   • Úlaire Nelya, Ringwraith in Twilight
3x   3U86   • Úlaire Otsea, Ringwraith in Twilight
4x   2U78   It Wants to be Found
4x   10R68   • Úlaire Enquea, Thrall of The One
3x   8R67   Between Nazgul and Prey
2x   9R+47   • Ithil Stone
1x Sauron's throne
4x Covetous Wisp
4x Morgul brute
4x Undead of Angmar
and either 4 x Candle Corpses or Dead Faces

And why the Thin and stretched, Morgul skulkers and a Tower assasin??? Only because The Ring Is Mine!? In that case I would even use a totally different deck:

4x Desperate Defense of the Ring
Thin and stretched
4x Orc Inquisitor
The Irresistible Shadow
4x The Ring Is Mine!
4x Gorgoroth Stormer
4x Mordor Fighter
Gollum, Stinker
3x Captured by the Ring
Fat One Wants It
So Polite
2x Dead Marshes   
3x Grishnakh, Orc Captain





Title: Re: Turbo Corrupt
Post by: Gil-Estel on March 06, 2009, 03:41:23 AM
Smeagollum, first this is movieblock. So Throne of the Dark Lord and such can't be added to the deck.
Second, well, ok....
Title: Re: Turbo Corrupt
Post by: Romanus on June 19, 2009, 07:17:42 PM
Why not replace the two Ithil Stones with Bent on Discovery? It gives you the same card-drawing ability and also the ability to exert your Enquea, ToTO without the four BNaP. The only benefit Ithil Stone has over BoD, then, is its ability to bring out one of your Sauron minions in a tight spot.
Title: Re: Turbo Corrupt
Post by: Enola on June 20, 2009, 01:40:39 AM
Now, I threw the Thin and Streched away and replaced it with 1 or 2 Bent on Discovery,
I play only 3 BNaP, otherwise it's clocking your hand.... and you need them to avoid characters like Faramir sod, Eowyn LOI, Gandalf+Staff ....
Moreover, Ithil Stone is an artifact and yeap you could play the minion you need in a tight spot ;).
Title: Re: Turbo Corrupt
Post by: Romanus on June 20, 2009, 06:36:48 AM
Why throw out the Thin and Stretched? It's a nasty little card that adds burdens quite well when you can get it out (and at least makes your opponent use Athelas or another condition remover..which prohibits him from using it elsewhere -- like if you wanted to throw in a Blade Tip). My idea was to throw out an Ithil Stone and put in three Bent on Discovery. To balance that out you can remove two BNaP because with BoD you already have that exertion power.

By the way, BNaP requires some major twilight, it's probably better to just bring out another minion instead of wasting that 4 twilight. For example, with two (or even one) Bent on Discovery on the table you get that exertion power you need for 10R68, and because you aren't paying 4 twilight for BNaP you can instead bring out a, say, WoPS to add ANOTHER burden.

Just my two cents.
Title: Re: Turbo Corrupt
Post by: Enola on June 20, 2009, 08:02:36 AM
Mmh Enquea+BNAP were only there to complete the deck, the strategy of the deck is not based on him.
And you really need BNaP, for the reasons I just said up there.
Title: Re: Turbo Corrupt
Post by: Romanus on June 20, 2009, 09:54:17 AM
Have a tenth of your deck (and [4] per card) devoted to protecting against two cards? I would say that it is better to combine the primary functions of BNaP and Ithil Stone - mainly, exerting Enquea TotO to add burdens and drawing cards to get what you need when you need it - into one card that costs [3] less, lets you draw more cards (BoD isn't unique like Ithil Stone), and still gets you that exerting power.

You can then devote the space and twilight you spent on BNaP on more minions.

*shrug* I'm actually stealing this deck idea from you for my shadow side on my Dwarf deck and to me it seemed like BoD is a stronger card for the deck than the combo of BNaP and Ithil Stone.
Title: Re: Turbo Corrupt
Post by: Romanus on June 21, 2009, 09:37:05 PM
3x   2R84   • Úlaire Nelya, Ringwraith in Twilight
4x   3U86   • Úlaire Otsea, Ringwraith in Twilight
4x   2U78   It Wants to be Found
4x   10R68   • Úlaire Enquea, Thrall of The One
3x   1R206   Bent on Discovery
2x   1R279   • Thin and Stretched
4x   1U258   Morgul Skulker
4x   10U97   The Ring Is Mine!
2x   6C108   Wisp of Pale Sheen
3x   1R244   Desperate Defense of the Ring
3x   1C261   Orc Ambusher

= 36 cards
= 20 minions
= 7 Twilight [Wraith] (to 4 cards that play off of them)
= 10 [Sauron] Minions (to 9 cards that play off of them)

The deck has one focus, to add burdens. Every card, every play, every action should be focused on that single goal; in my opinion, if it doesn't contribute to adding burdens, it's useless. You don't need to win skirmishes, all this deck relies on actually is just getting to them, and (in the case of Wisp of Pale Sheen) surviving them. That being said, this deck still has three parts to add burdens:

I threw in the cheapest [Sauron] minions that I could find to use as exerting fodder for the conditions since they don't need to win skirmishes at all (just be assigned for some DDotR action) and this deck requires MAJOR twilight. I played a deck similar to this one and found that to be its major weakness. To be effective, it requires both your [Sauron] and [Wraith] minions to be out; even when that isn't necessary, you're still spending high twilight on one or the other.

You need a total of, at least, [6] to add a single burden with strategy #1 (the twilight nazgul and IWTBF). It then takes - at least - another [3] (with roaming) to add another with The Ring is Mine!. So we're talking [8] to add just two burdens.

Say that is one turn, then the next turn you decide to bring out Úlaire Enquea, Thrall of The One with two Bent on Discovery in order to exert him and get two more cards in hand (lets say to get a The Ring is Mine!). That requires [8], plus the [3] or [4] required of the [Sauron] strategy. So we're talking another 11 twilight to add three burdens.

It's going to be very hard to balance the [Wraith] and [Sauron] sides of this deck to get the cards that you need out when you need them; drawing them when you need will be a problem (especially for your two burden adding events) but also playing everything you need (that is, a [Wraith] AND a [Sauron] minion in the same turn to get even adequate burden potential.

Also think that this deck moves the [Wraith] from early game to late game, since it will be only then that they can get the twilight they need to play effectively (even Ford of Bruinen is out). Furthermore, against a small fellowship this deck will most likely lose. Say at Site 5 we are getting [6] for the site plus [3] for the fellowship and MAYBE [2] or [3] for stuff played. That's barely enough to add two burdens with a perfect hand.

So basically to say, with any Turbo Corruption deck (the above build or yours) you are going to have to work on twilight management. Having played a deck like this and planning on using the above model for a deck, I can say that maximizing burdens for twilight is a lot harder than it seems. It's a solid deck build, but its hard to play because it requires lots of balance.

Sorry for the double post, but anyone please tell me what you think.