The Last Homely House
Middle-Earth => Lothlórien => Topic started by: jdizzy001 on December 06, 2010, 09:59:35 AM
-
Traditionally, Aragorn is a more used companion than Faramir. I ask why? Unless your deck is specifically designed for gorn, is there a reason to choose gorn over Faramir? Largely I am refering to Faramir Son of Denethor. No skirmish events can be used against him! That is way cool. Slap a sword and armor on faramir and ba-boom your set. of course there are reasons to use gorn over faramir, str 8 vit 4 to begin. most gorns can be made def +1 very easily, and almost all of gorn's weapons make him dmg +1. These are very good reasons to use gorn over faramir, but a knight's sword can make faramir dmg+1 and i will go can make him def+1. Tell me what you think, who is the better companion?
-
1. Faramir, Son of Denethor is good. But Aragorn, RotN is a better splash card as he can save you from swarms among other things... I once had rotn face 4 HUGE damage+1 uruk hais including lurtz. those uruk hais would've wreaked havoc on my fp otherwise.
2. Aragorn is of course better in a multicultural deck (using signets, pipeweed, tmayod, tokens, three hunters etc etc)
-
Silly comparison. It's all circumstantial as to which is better.
Edit: Faramir because he's Auzzie. Haha.
-
Faramir gets a decent amount of play, I thought...
-
He does, I was just trying to make conversation? ;)