LotR TCG Wiki → Card Sets:  All 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 → Forums:  TLHH CC

Welcome, guests!

Join our growing LotR community today and you'll get:

  • Access to special members only-forums.
  • A great way to connect and hook up with other players.
  • Removal of advertisements in the forums and wiki.
  • The ability to list cards you want to trade or sell.
  • ...And much more!
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Print

Author Topic: Let's get a consensus about Harrowdale  (Read 204 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
bibfortuna25
Ranger
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 818


Gold: +86

« on: February 01, 2012, 12:12:54 AM »
0

See this post in the League forums:

http://lotrtcgwiki.com/forums/index.php/topic,7592.msg75683.html#msg75683

What is the majority opinion of the boards? If the fellowship begins their turn at Harrowdale and then moves to a different site, does Harrowdale still prevent minions assigned to Rohan companions from being fierce?
Logged

All cards do what they say, no more, no less.


Elessar's Socks
Global Mod
Knight
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1370


"I see...I look foul and feel foul. Is that it?"

Gold: +116

« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2012, 03:53:17 AM »
0

For me it comes down to whether "Until the regroup phase," was intended to mean the entire "each minion skirmishing a Rohan companion loses fierce and cannot gain fierce" part should be in effect for that period of time, or whether it was just intended to describe how long the "loses fierce and cannot gain fierce" part was supposed to last.

I'm thinking it's the latter (a 'no' to your question) because I just feel it's odd the designers would make it something like Mount Doom. But as written, I think you've already made a case for minions at the next site losing fierce.
Logged
jdizzy001
Ranger
*****
Offline Offline

GCCG: Jdizzy001
Formats: Movie, Casual
Posts: 874

Gold: +64

« Reply #2 on: February 03, 2012, 02:27:56 PM »
0

Bib makes a compelling argument, but isn't the text of a site kind of limited to the site itself (mount doom being an obvious exception)?
Logged

*All posts made by jdizzy001, regardless of the thread in which they appear, are expressions of his own opinion and as such are not representative of views shared by any third party unless expressly acknowledged as such by said party.

I play LOTR SBG look at my minis!
http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.124731667611081.33577.100002227457509&l=aeb5fa3bdd
NappyKorn
Knight
*****
Offline Offline

GCCG: Nappy
Formats: Standard, Expanded and Movie Block
Posts: 1263


The ShizKnight

Gold: +212

« Reply #3 on: February 03, 2012, 02:35:01 PM »
0

well isn't it kinda like that fellowship site 2 that says something lik eif you can spot a ranger the move limit for this turn is +1? Even if you don't stay there and move on you can still triple to site 4.

I may be way off but who knows, anyway I would play it as if you started the game at site 1 and it was harrowdale the minions at site 2 that get assigned to Rohan companions would lose fierce and be unable to gain it until the 'first' regroup phase which would be at site 2.


NK
Logged

If a Balrog falls from a bridge and noone is around, does it make a sound?
MR. Lurtzy
King
*****
Offline Offline

Formats: Fellowship; Towers Standard
Posts: 2756


My name is Wepeel

Gold: +218

« Reply #4 on: February 03, 2012, 03:24:41 PM »
0

I believe move limits are a separate issue, as it remain modified even when the card leaves, no matter what type it is.
Logged

NappyKorn
Knight
*****
Offline Offline

GCCG: Nappy
Formats: Standard, Expanded and Movie Block
Posts: 1263


The ShizKnight

Gold: +212

« Reply #5 on: February 03, 2012, 03:42:00 PM »
0

On a seperate note though it is a site question. If site 1 is city gates do you start the game by adding a threat? In Gccg when you play the site and click it it does say X amount of companions moves to said site. Im not sure if there is a rule that the fellowship doesnt move to site one or not but is placed there kind of like the Ring-bearer is the only companion placed into play not played. Interesting question either way I guess.

Feel free to split this to another topic if it is not welcomed here, LOL.

NK
Logged

If a Balrog falls from a bridge and noone is around, does it make a sound?
bibfortuna25
Ranger
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 818


Gold: +86

« Reply #6 on: February 03, 2012, 05:00:30 PM »
0

You don't move to site 1, so a City Gates there wouldn't do anything.
Logged

All cards do what they say, no more, no less.
Elessar's Socks
Global Mod
Knight
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1370


"I see...I look foul and feel foul. Is that it?"

Gold: +116

« Reply #7 on: February 03, 2012, 08:25:07 PM »
0

Come to think (and this was mentioned in the other thread), another reason I get the feeling "until the regroup phase" is meant to be at the end is because otherwise, the card doesn't say how long the lose / can't gain effects should last. I believe these cards usually say it explicitly (e.g. Mithril-coat DM, Prized Lagan, Uruk-hai Rampage).

So at the front, I would've expected the lose / can't gain effects to last until the end of the skirmish phase, because the card wouldn't say otherwise. I'm not sure we can have it both ways by double-dipping the "until the regroup phase" part.
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: