Search found 3934 matches

AnxiousChieftain · Replies: **123** Views: **51362**

You do not need the word ’Skirmish:’ in there. You are not performing an action, so there is no need for it.

The strength bonus will be very hard to get, because there are very few ways to get ...

AnxiousChieftain · Replies: **123** Views: **51362**

Looks good, although a spotting requirement might be good.

AnxiousChieftain · Replies: 30 Views: **20959**

[quote="Cobra"]As I write this, though, "The Time of the Elves is Over!?" is the highest-rated article in our database, bumping AnxiousChieftain’s [url=http://lotrtcgdb.com/community/viewtopic.php?...

AnxiousChieftain · Replies: **125** Views: **134645**

CarpeGuitarrem wrote:

I found the clue, but...now what?

Google it! Very Happy

AnxiousChieftain · Replies: **123** Views: **51362**

Again, not culturally enforced.

AnxiousChieftain · Replies: **123** Views: **51362**

I’d only let it play on

Uruk-hai... and speaking of which, the correct name in the TCG is Uruk-hai, Not Uruks.

AnxiousChieftain · Replies: 62 Views: **31000**

I really like the pic on The Number Must be Few. The background imagery is neat.

AnxiousChieftain · Replies: **123** Views: **51362**

CG’s card: Awesome. No revisions needed.

AP’s card: Not culturally enforced, and Uruks generally shouldn’t add burdens, since it isn’t one of the things that their culture does.

AnxiousChieftain · Replies: 9 Views: **5043**

Anonymous Prodigy wrote:

SoP: M_H has all the rules and he quotes them very often; if you have a question, just PM him instead of posting a thread.

It would probably be better to just have ...

AnxiousChieftain · Replies: **123** Views: **51362**

CG is correct. Even so, I don’t really like the idea of a condition that always gives +2 strength - maybe it should only trigger at a battleground site... like this:

•Killing Rampage [Uruk-...