Search found 576 matches

[BattleWarg]

AnxiousChieftain wrote:

I’m pretty sure it’s the first Shadow player to the right.

- AC

(To clarify for others, the first Shadow player who would be able to play a card) - I know I ...

[BattleWarg]

[quote="bobtheorc"]The "new" site path mechanic doesn’t make a ton of sense either.
Frodo and Sam can start on Mount Doom and reach site nine which could be Hobbiton Market!
I have played games ...

[BattleWarg]

ingold55 wrote:

In answer to battleWarg, (if i am correct) yes it is discarded. "discard all conditions."

But you wouldn’t discard your opponent’s FP conditions because they are...

[BattleWarg]

TheJord wrote:

In a multiplayer game, would this apply to unique conditions in the 2 Shadows players support areas?

see CG’s response.

Although, if they aren’t active, if they play S...

[BattleWarg]

[quote="CarpeGuitarrem"]IMO, you really don’t need a good excuse for an ARB any more. I mean, the whole idea of an ARB makes no sense with regard to the story. Only the hobbits had any hope of beari...

[BattleWarg]

Alright, so now we have 2 Ring-bound Rangers.

[BattleWarg]

AC

EL

[BattleWarg]

CarpeGuitarrem wrote:

Well...I think Curubethion would be ring-bound, since he’s the dude with the "Ring", so to speak. Not literally, but he serves a similar role.

Alright. Should I add...

[BattleWarg]

NBarden wrote:

I guess you can claim one. But if you don’t post a deck soon enough, it will be everyone’s game.

Well, I’ve got a basic deck... It’s a bit too large, so I’ll see...

[BattleWarg]

Alright, so let’s say - not DC (although feel free to make DCs based on it).

[quote="ingold55"]I would say this is out. It was tried, and became very boring. (too read at least, no offence.) [/qu...