Author |
Message |
Topic: Realms of the North: Card List & Discussion
|
BattleWarg
Replies: 250
Views: 75588
|
CarpeGuitarrem wrote: Eh...how exactly did the Icewarg get bumped down to 9 strength? He should be at 12, right? (+1 for the site, 11 printed)
He’s got 10 printed strength... Eomer, did ...
 Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 6:51 pm
|
 |
Topic: Munchkin (Silly but playable)
|
BattleWarg
Replies: 6
Views: 3671
|
A Pair of level ups...
 1,000 Gold Pieces [Munchkin]
Condition
+1 Strength
Bearer must be a [Munchkin] companion. Limit 1 per character.
[i]Monty Haul games always have a larger number of ...
 Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 4:18 pm
|
 |
Topic: Legoles's Elven Wonders DC contest!!!!! VOTING ON LEGOLAS
|
BattleWarg
Replies: 129
Views: 48093
|
I’ll give it a shot 
 Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 4:12 pm
|
 |
Topic: Realms of the North: Card List & Discussion
|
BattleWarg
Replies: 250
Views: 75588
|
sickofpalantirs wrote: Do I even need to make a card?
That’s another question - can we ’save’ the card (making a  or less card in the future), or do we make the cards now, planning...
 Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 4:07 pm
|
 |
Topic: Realms of the North: Card List & Discussion
|
BattleWarg
Replies: 250
Views: 75588
|
Well, let’s see...
SoP, you removed 2  tokens from Deep Calm to heal, right? Then I’m the only one with a wound (and I only have one)...
We got a unique 11/3/3/Damage +1 Warg to fi...
 Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 1:57 am
|
 |
Topic: Realms of the North: Card List & Discussion
|
BattleWarg
Replies: 250
Views: 75588
|
[quote="AgentDrake"] legoles3333 wrote: PEOPLE I WAS TRYING TO INSPIRE HIM, AND YOU MESSED IT UP!!!
But I have an idea...
We could throw our characters into a seperate, short 4 or 5...
 Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 6:32 pm
|
 |
Topic: Munchkin (Silly but playable)
|
BattleWarg
Replies: 6
Views: 3671
|
Going through the stack... More FP cards...
 Loaded Die [Munchkin]
Possession
Bearer must be a [Munchkin] companion.
Response: If you are about to discard a card at random from any...
 Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 4:26 pm
|
 |
Topic: 3rd Clone Attack DC Contest - Yoda
|
BattleWarg
Replies: 16
Views: 8865
|
Padme A and C still reference "Padme Amidala", where it should probably be "Padme".
Also, I don’t know about everyone else, but I think the required (and suggested) information should be with the...
 Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 4:11 pm
|
 |
Topic: 2nd Clone Attack DC Contest - Overview
|
BattleWarg
Replies: 35
Views: 12055
|
[quote="DáinIronfoot"]I finally have all my votes in (check my original post), but I think I better bow out of making cards this round. I just can’t come up with any ideas I like, and there’s alr...
 Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 3:06 pm
|
 |
Topic: AP's Retro DC Contest
|
BattleWarg
Replies: 167
Views: 44763
|
AC
NB
Dain
 Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 12:22 pm
|
 |
|