Search found 3357 matches

[CarpeGuitarrem]

I agree with everyone else-smashing good article! Love that formula, love the thorough explanation of the combo. Well-earned 5. I’m glad there’s more article places out this month than 2.

[CarpeGuitarrem]

[quote="NBarden"]AGH!!!!

For the record, I said I’d do any card, and I will, but I prefer to avoid Gollum DCs...

I’m also gonna slap a limit that the person who asks for a DC can’t ask for...

[CarpeGuitarrem]

AC, you sure about that? Because...this is supposed to be a single-elimination thing...

[CarpeGuitarrem]

AnxiousChieftain wrote:

Cool article, but I would’ve liked more strategy for each decktype (maybe have 2 paragraphs total for each deck?).

Agreed...as it was, I thought the strategy was...

[CarpeGuitarrem]

No problem, I think my reaction was actually a bit over the top as well...

I did take a look at Into the West when writing this article, but I figured it wasn’t really worth it to include a lone ...

[CarpeGuitarrem]

[quote="Mouth of Saruman"]Thanks for the support!

Today we move from the the foul culture to the fun-lowing Hobbits of the . Once again I have decided to add my own strategy to a cu...

[CarpeGuitarrem]

Also, even if they both triggered at the start of the Fellowship phase, the FP player would get to choose in which order they came.

[CarpeGuitarrem]

A decklist?? I spent just about four paragraphs explaining the combo, then had a decklist, then spent two more solid paragraphs discussing strategy. Then I included matchups. A decklist??

And I don...

[CarpeGuitarrem]

I vote AP, simply because it was funnier as a parody card. And it could actually work, theoretically, as long as you can prove a companion was wishing SoP had submitted his DC on time.

[CarpeGuitarrem]

Ooh, from "Gollum’s Song"! I like it!