Search found 3357 matches

[CarpeGuitarrem]

Anonymous Prodigy wrote:

It looks like the public has spoken.

Yeah, no kidding. Although I do think an Expanded restriction or X-ing is in order. But not until the rest of the set is se...

[CarpeGuitarrem]

You know, ring-bound hobbits are already extremely overpowered. I mean, any deck that peels off eight burdens per site is just crazy anyway. That doesn’t make this card overpowered.

[CarpeGuitarrem]

"Exert a non-enduring Dragon twice (or heal an enduring Dragon...)"

[CarpeGuitarrem]

Not bad, reword the start of the response action to be "If the Ring-bearer is about to..."

That one’ll be...Uncommon, number 2.

Request:
A Tale of Disaster
Uncommon
152

Should de...

[CarpeGuitarrem]

Exert and discard the possession, IMO, and that would be cool.

[CarpeGuitarrem]

[quote="PorterTroll"]CG, you said that transfering EA was a lot to pay for its ability, now I completely disagree with this. At the MOST it will cost two to play on a non unique companion, then anoth...

[CarpeGuitarrem]

Thranduil wrote:

’Right everyone, let’s make a card that reminds you of a tuna-fish sandwich!’

Wow, that is so brilliant that I don’t know where to start. I’d :g...

[CarpeGuitarrem]

[quote="AdultLink"]The card is good, but legit. People are going crazy and trying to find x-list material in every card since there has been such a splurge lately. Ring of Doom is 10 times better than...

[CarpeGuitarrem]

Which basically does shut down FP archery, because you don’t play it. In game, it doesn’t shut down FP archery, but it shuts down FP archery from any practical point of view.

[CarpeGuitarrem]

PorterTroll wrote:

Oh, come on! That’s not true and you know it, if someone wants to use a freeps archery deck that bad, EA isn’t gonna stop em!

Huh? You mean I can use a Freeps arch...