| Search found 2421 matches |
 Forum index » Search |
| Page 17 of 243 [2421 Posts] | Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, ..., 241, 242, 243 Next |
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
| Topic: Resolving of the abilities | |
|
Felipe Musco Replies: 13 Views: 9213 |
Quite correct. While I actually LIKE having a stack (makes gameplay more tricky, favoring who trains more, knows more, etc), in LotR "resolving" abilities is quite more player-friendly, for begginers ...
 Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:31 pm |
| Topic: Resolving of the abilities | |
|
Felipe Musco Replies: 13 Views: 9213 |
[quote="NBarden"]
Lurkerburger wrote:
For me , MTG has pretty easy rules for resolving. But when we try to figure out this in LOTR... we have problems. MtG triggers are a lot more complic... Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:48 pm |
| Topic: To Swing for 40...(U/W/G) | |
|
Felipe Musco Replies: 25 Views: 18464 |
He’s kinda missing the point that the deck is supposed to be about Dark Depths... Oh, and just for general information, I played a Standard tournament today, piloting Paul Cheon’s GP-winning UW Pi...
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:44 pm |
| Topic: Challenge number 3: Answer these questions! | |
|
Felipe Musco Replies: 10 Views: 21972 |
That’s right. Playing a card is announcing it, and paying any costs associated with it. If it’s a spell, it goes on the stack. If the spell summons a permanent, and it resolves, the permanent come...
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:20 pm |
| Topic: To Swing for 40...(U/W/G) | |
|
Felipe Musco Replies: 25 Views: 18464 |
Don’t think so, these decks usually have a tight base, so it’s a no-go.
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:19 pm |
| Topic: Challenge number 3: Answer these questions! | |
|
Felipe Musco Replies: 10 Views: 21972 |
It wouldn’t, because Pithing Needle is a permanent, not a spell (like Conjurer’s Ban). The "as X comes into play" bit denotes it as part of the spell’s resolution.
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:23 pm |
| Topic: LOTR TCG French Championship 2007 | |
|
Felipe Musco Replies: 66 Views: 49352 |
LotR cards are pictures, made with actors. It’s got a whole other ffeling to them, which is quite cool and different. However, I’m sorry to differ, but artwork beats photographs hands down any day...
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:19 pm |
| Topic: To Swing for 40...(U/W/G) | |
|
Felipe Musco Replies: 25 Views: 18464 |
They are. I’m playing 3 in my UG aggro.
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:14 pm |
| Topic: Challenge number 3: Answer these questions! | |
|
Felipe Musco Replies: 10 Views: 21972 |
[quote="Elessar’s Socks"]So I was digging around some more on Question 3, and there was a similar incident with someone playing Meddling Mage and forgetting to name a card. (Although I doubt Cobra f...
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:06 pm |
| Topic: Challenge number 3: Answer these questions! | |
|
Felipe Musco Replies: 10 Views: 21972 |
Question 1 (easy):
Bto attacks physcosick with Mire Boa, but before damage goes on the stack physco plays Sudden Shock, targetting the Boa, claiming it dies. Bto argues that, in fact, he can... Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 3:45 pm |
| Page 17 of 243 [2421 Posts] | Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, ..., 241, 242, 243 Next |
|
Forum index » Search |
Powered by phpBB
//
Template by Mike Lothar