Search found 795 matches

[La_Sin_Grail]

inresponse wrote:

this is all for second game, when you board in the rewinds so you have more than 8 counterspells.

Oh I’m sorry I thought you were talking about rewinds in mainboard. ...

[La_Sin_Grail]

Yeah... I was really ticked because we had a moldervine that NEVER hit the table once. We NEVER frew it. We only got one other decent bomb- a chant of vitu-ghazi. (Okay, it’s not really a bomb bu...

[La_Sin_Grail]

[quote="inresponse"]the first goal against other control decks is not to stop them from negating your win conditions, but to negate the opposing win conditions. In this way, rewind is clearly better,...

[La_Sin_Grail]

 2HG

[La_Sin_Grail]

I suppose so... I just can’t help but wonder what this deck can’t deal with. Those finishers are pretty phat and if they’re going to kill them or fetter them, it’ll be the turn you play them ...

[La_Sin_Grail]

I guess fuge is good for anti-control... I still would say he’s much more of a sideboard type than maindeck

As for remand... I think it’s one of the bst counterspells in the game. The fact tha...

[La_Sin_Grail]

I personally think fuge is overused and verging on bad. When he was a 4/3, I was going to use him in every deck I made, but when the actualy cards came out and the spoiler was wrong... I don’t know...

[La_Sin_Grail]

agreed on hinder. What I meant by the whole untapping thing was not that you won’t have an instant, but that you 1) won’t have one you want to use with the mana and 2) it costs four no matter how...

[La_Sin_Grail]

Are they really good? I might start reading them...

would you recommend them?

[La_Sin_Grail]

Yeah... rewind will be a better call not just because of the untapping thing, though. Remember that it will work better on control and less on agro, but I suppose you’re covered on the agro front h...