| Author |
Message |
|
Topic: Northmen (and Women) Unite! Rohan's Fighting Frodo!
|
NBarden
Replies: 18
Views: 9875
|
I know, I was just saying since he didn’t use them for the deck, he might want to take those sections out.
 Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:13 pm
|
 |
|
Topic: New Rohan Rising – Living on the edge
|
NBarden
Replies: 35
Views: 18920
|
 Um....this is Gillian’s article...
 Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:12 pm
|
 |
|
Topic: New Set: The Third Age (update 3/6: Gandalf stuff)
|
NBarden
Replies: 51
Views: 21010
|
[quote="DáinIronfoot"]Okay, thanks for the reviews thus far, guys. I think we can move on now and continue the  armaments with Berethor!
 • Berethor, Leader of the Company [Gondo...
 Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:02 pm
|
 |
|
Topic: Spoiler: Weapons of Lothlorien
|
NBarden
Replies: 16
Views: 6967
|
Good swarms should have enough vitality to cope with archery, but not with this card. Now their vitality disappears and archery fire finishes them off. Any who do survive get easily knocked off by Gil...
 Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:47 pm
|
 |
|
Topic: The Rise of Saruman
|
NBarden
Replies: 48
Views: 21928
|
Oh, okay. He would hurt Dwarves pretty bad. Resistance 0 dwarves, just take out the smaller guys such as Sindri, Uri, etc. with your Shingle in a storm. And they’re strength -2. And then with a low ...
 Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:21 pm
|
 |
|
Topic: Spoiler: Glamdring, Orc-Beater
|
NBarden
Replies: 20
Views: 10949
|
And then Gandalf’s Staff, Walking Stick...Good bye minions...Then stick him on Gandalf, Mithrandir...
I though high damage was a dwarf thing.
 Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:12 pm
|
 |
|
Topic: Spoiler: Warrior of Rohan
|
NBarden
Replies: 9
Views: 4501
|
I disagree. He would never see play. In order to liberate site, you have to play a possession on him, and then it couldn’t be transfered.
 Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:11 pm
|
 |
|
Topic: The Rise of Saruman
|
NBarden
Replies: 48
Views: 21928
|
I noticed that you mentioned Solo Decks in your Master of the White Hand section. How would this own Solo Decks? Because the resistance lowering would only be on unbound companions, so, IMO, solo deck...
 Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:09 pm
|
 |
|
Topic: Solo Strategies
|
NBarden
Replies: 57
Views: 30134
|
I’m aware that PATHS is a good card, but if you’d have looked through all the review you would have seen my reason for not including it. Adding burdens against Nazgul is pretty risky, and burdens ...
 Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:35 pm
|
 |
|
Topic: Dáin’s DC Duos #s 48-62 (Concluded 3/1 with two Duos)
|
NBarden
Replies: 93
Views: 28955
|
Just thought I’d let you know, the link in your sig is linking to your Gollum DCs.
 Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:30 pm
|
 |
| |