| Search found 1192 matches |
 Forum index » Search |
| Page 69 of 120 [1192 Posts] | Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, ..., 118, 119, 120 Next |
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
| Topic: An overview of Sam | |
|
PorterTroll Replies: 41 Views: 19896 |
[quote="CarpeGuitarrem"]Look who’s talking about not facing trolls!
But I agree, very few decks pack Uruk-Hai any more. Although Trolls still exist. But you really don’t want to be playing ...  Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 12:20 am |
| Topic: Favorite Cards | |
|
PorterTroll Replies: 34 Views: 14918 |
wow, thats a lot of favorites
 Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 12:14 am |
| Topic: PorterTroll's Collection of Trolls | |
|
PorterTroll Replies: 137 Views: 44354 |
 Vulgrat, Wielder of Grond 
Minion Troll Strength 13 Vitality 3 Site 4 Shadow Exert this minion to make the free peoples player choose to either add  or exert a companion.
hows that... Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:35 pm |
| Topic: Favorite Cards | |
|
PorterTroll Replies: 34 Views: 14918 |
What is your favorite card and why?
Mine is obviously porter troll (go figure, eh?) because of its amazing stats and great burden adding ability.  Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:22 pm |
| Topic: X-Lists • R-Lists | |
|
PorterTroll Replies: 85 Views: 100890 |
no, because the site number is a completely different source of twilight, you cannot lose twilight by having a negative source of twilight. the twilight number of a site can go to a minimum of zero....
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 10:52 pm |
| Topic: Kill Bill: Volume 1 | |
|
PorterTroll Replies: 13 Views: 8877 |
[quote="reggierockz"]Porter Troll - That all depends on which deck you are referring to. The first deck would be able to cause some damage to Gimli or Boromir beacause it can keep playing Bill over an...
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 10:49 pm |
| Topic: X-Lists • R-Lists | |
|
PorterTroll Replies: 85 Views: 100890 |
not just that, it can make any of the new site numbers have a twilight of
 (with multiple copies) because it is non-unique, which is way too good Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 10:35 pm |
| Topic: Kill Bill: Volume 1 | |
|
PorterTroll Replies: 13 Views: 8877 |
i like it, but it would definitely have trouble against shadowplay decks. add another pavise so you can always have one on ferny (otherwise he could clog your hand, you also might want to add another...
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 10:30 pm |
| Topic: An overview of Sam | |
|
PorterTroll Replies: 41 Views: 19896 |
yes, but what im saying is that stone trolls is utterly useless and just takes up deck space unless you can spot bilbo and if your playing against uruk-hai or trolls.
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 10:23 pm |
| Topic: An overview of Sam | |
|
PorterTroll Replies: 41 Views: 19896 |
why 2x stone trolls? it seems like a useless card unless your facing trolls or uruk-hai, i would remove it and put in another sudden fury and fates entwined
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 9:52 pm |
| Page 69 of 120 [1192 Posts] | Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, ..., 118, 119, 120 Next |
|
Forum index » Search |
Powered by phpBB
//
Template by Mike Lothar