Search found 1209 matches

[bobtheorc]

I get what you mean. I do like this article better than the other one by pipeweed about the Legolas, GImli and arargorn.

[bobtheorc]

Ok I get that, but you still should explain and devote more effort to your shadow side. After all you have a lot about your pretty understable freeps but nothing about the shadow..

[bobtheorc]

I think that a 3 means good job, 4 great job, and 5 means that the article is the best on this site. So going by that AP’s vote is not that low. AP when are you going to vote? I give tha article a ...

[bobtheorc]

decent article but it still has some of the weaknessess that it had as a 4 part series. I still think you shouldn’t list a Shadow side unless you plan to analize it and explain how it works. After ...

[bobtheorc]

.[quote]Well for strong companions, once you get out Radagast and Treebeard the other two are just there. Go ahead and let them die if you please. Once you use up Erland he is just an extra twilight t...

[bobtheorc]

This articel should probably get either a high 3 or low 4.

[bobtheorc]

Ok soo the deck is good. However this is a strategy article contest not neccesarrily a "build a good deck that kills" contest. And as SoP mentioned there are not that many strong companions in the dec...

[bobtheorc]

[quote="Chang"]why is Narya in this deck? isn’t it that if you have Gandalf as a ring bearer he can’t have another ring? (I may well be wrong, but I’ve been told this with my dwarf deck.)[/quote...

[bobtheorc]

The cutlass part doesn’t make sense.
The clue even fits with [censored] but it doesn’t work.

[bobtheorc]

Enraged Uruk
Minion • Uruk-hai
Strength: 16
Vitality: 4
Site Number: 5
Damage +1 Fierce
SkimishExert this minion to take into hand a event or posses...