Search found 162 matches

[inresponse]

yes, you can face decks with the difficult cards in them. THAT IS THE POINT OF DESIGNING MAGIC DECKS. Eeveryone buiilds decks to make the field suffer. However, the number of players playing R/W is ...

[inresponse]

I actually didn't vote on this article, so no 1s or 2s from me

[inresponse]

I think jitte would fit this deck better than most others. Because of your wide threat diversity you lsoe power among your creatures, leaving a generally underwhelming army to beat your opponent. Ki...

[inresponse]

after a quick read I only have problems with the many, many 2 ofs.

[inresponse]

bear refers to a 2 power creature for 2 mana.

R/W control is not a deck currently played in the environment. Turn 4 wrath is painful, but it doesn't end the game. On turn four damage has already...

[inresponse]

there is no bear with 1 toughness that I am aware of. I am referencing grizzly bears for its two mana cost for 2power. The toughness of the creature is irrelevant. It is worse than a grizzly...

[inresponse]

entwine is different than splice. The mana cost of a spell differs drastically from its converted mana cost. The reason I believe this about converted mana cost is because at States this year my opp...

[inresponse]

You can recover from pyroclasm. Which I said in the article, bu toyu didn't take the time to read before finding that "fault".

There is no reason to add another color when it doesn't help, especia...

[inresponse]

I will not "counter" pyroclasm. However, it is not as great a trade as them not casting pyroclasm. Obviously Pyroclasm is a problem, as is wrath of god. those cards are designed to deal with creatu...

[inresponse]

e-mail a judge, the combo does not work. Also, the combo wil not be in theme decks because the theme decks will only use cards from ravnica block, and will not extend into Kamigawa.

Even if the co...