Search found 7739 matches

[sickofpalantirs]

no I don’t want them that bad.

[sickofpalantirs]

Pipeweed wrote:

No problem I just want to get rid of them. If no one is interested, I’ll just try to find someone in my area who will let me give the cards to them

Cheers,
PW

...

[sickofpalantirs]

[quote="AnxiousChieftain"]CG is correct. Even so, I don’t really like the idea of a condition that always gives +2 strength - maybe it should only trigger at a battleground site... like this:

...

[sickofpalantirs]

my next q.
what are all teh physical formats and their restreictions/x lists

[sickofpalantirs]

are we supposed to make cards for these guys or give advice or what?

[sickofpalantirs]

if you want to have friends lose sometimes.

[sickofpalantirs]

it si a good article but i personally normally don’t have troubles playing I just convince my shadow teammates that I can play best.

[sickofpalantirs]

bibfortuna25 wrote:

The Free Peoples player cannot assign Bill, so the Shadow player gets to assign him anywhere they want.

sdweet OK that is what i expected but i ocudn’t believe it....

[sickofpalantirs]

to me it looks like for an archery deck it has way too few archers.

[sickofpalantirs]

Anonymous Prodigy wrote:

My favorite is corruption, hands down.

that is wicked.