| Author |
Message |
| Gagnut |
![]() Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:49 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 846
Location: Ames, Iowa
|
PorterTroll wrote: why do you have gollum, hopeless in there? you only need mad thing, stinker, and dark as darkness
I have it in there because I don’t have alot of gollums. |
| I don't have an avatar, I don't have a sig, my posts speak for themselves. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| SnowBalrog |
![]() Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 2:31 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 63
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
|
Gagnut wrote: CarpeGuitarrem wrote: Yes...although I think that Gollum corruption is currently not a viable way to win. Go for the wounding.
I was playing with this deck and wounding was awsome, I’m going to tinker a bit more on this, thanks for the insight, I gave you a coin SB.
I’ve actually played Gollum corruption before (One of my weirder versions is in the Deck Bible over on Decipher’s boards) It can work, but it’s a little harder to pull off... Wounding is more Gollum’s strength. Try both! Gollum is one of the coolest minions to use. Thanks for the GP, I gave you one too. |
Marcus: Our Snow Balrog would be a lot more impressive if it didn't keep melting.
Jason: Maybe if we used a little less lighter fluid...? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Gagnut |
![]() Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:45 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 846
Location: Ames, Iowa
|
| THanks, I still need some more cards, I’ll try different things. |
| I don't have an avatar, I don't have a sig, my posts speak for themselves. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| PorterTroll |
![]() Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:48 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 1193
Location: not sure yet
|
CarpeGuitarrem wrote: Because Hopeless works wonders with pumped-up RBs.
True, but Dark as Darkness has a better ability and can add twilight. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| CarpeGuitarrem |
![]() Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 7:59 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Posts: 3361
Location: Franciscan University of Steubenville
|
Wait...he doesn’t have DaD??? What is wrong with him?  
I’d advocate putting both in. |
| "ok, change of plans. the Cobracards christmas party is coming to my house, and we’re gunna teach FM how to hunt." (mm) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Gagnut |
![]() Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:32 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 846
Location: Ames, Iowa
|
| I’ll take what I can get, I have only seen one in person. |
| I don't have an avatar, I don't have a sig, my posts speak for themselves. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Pipeweed |
![]() Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 11:34 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 1010
Location: Earth (I think)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| SnowBalrog |
![]() Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 12:10 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 63
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
|
| DaD isn’t worth it... the point is to ADD burdens.... and with that the wounding/exerting text is pointless. Mad Thing and Stinker are enough. And perhaps Hopeless. Also there’s a condition that lets you exert to add a burden each time a companion loses a fierce skirmish. Just another thing to consider. |
Marcus: Our Snow Balrog would be a lot more impressive if it didn't keep melting.
Jason: Maybe if we used a little less lighter fluid...? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Gagnut |
![]() Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 9:35 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 846
Location: Ames, Iowa
|
| The cards is okay, but I think I can get better gollums. |
| I don't have an avatar, I don't have a sig, my posts speak for themselves. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| PorterTroll |
![]() Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 10:56 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 1193
Location: not sure yet
|
| also, why do you have that legolas? its completely useless unless your playing against nazgul |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Forum index » Lord of the Rings TCG » LOTR TCG Deck Clinics » Expanded