Author |
Message |
Pipsqueak |
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 1:44 pm |
|
|
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 331
Location: A northerner down south
|
Gondor is great, but everything depends on roaming minions. but i would still say that it's one of the best |
Long live the southern bros. |
|
Back to top |
|
syndrome |
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:52 pm |
|
|
Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 423
Location: A cold place.
|
|
Back to top |
|
Guest |
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 11:08 am |
|
|
Joined:
Posts:
Location:
|
Phazanzar wrote: But seriously, Smeagol pwns. When was the last time you saw an 80, dam + 9 gondor companion?
For a 1-time use. You're screwed after that. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
syndrome |
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 2:38 pm |
|
|
Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 423
Location: A cold place.
|
Site 9 = no more sites.
Besides, he can have a 11 base strength, 13 with ring on. And Nasty (I have 4 in my deck) makes him strength +1 for each card you can see. 1 or 2 of these is used in huge smeagol setup, but as you saw last night, I can easily get +10(+) added to his strength with (1) twilight.
He is a tough little bugger. |
http://myspace/delicatesituation |
|
Back to top |
|
Pipsqueak |
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 4:28 pm |
|
|
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 331
Location: A northerner down south
|
i agree with phazanzar about solo smeagol decks. i also agree with him back on jan 02, about moria orcs. archers in particular. |
Long live the southern bros. |
|
Back to top |
|
Guest |
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 5:17 pm |
|
|
Joined:
Posts:
Location:
|
Phazanzar wrote: Site 9 = no more sites.
Besides, he can have a 11 base strength, 13 with ring on. And Nasty (I have 4 in my deck) makes him strength +1 for each card you can see. 1 or 2 of these is used in huge smeagol setup, but as you saw last night, I can easily get +10(+) added to his strength with (1) twilight.
He is a tough little bugger.
I do remember a time when he was unable to take on a couple of Uruk-Hai... There still is a problem, if you don't draw those cards, that is, the cards you need, you're screwed with Solo-Smeagol. I've noticed that sort of trend with your decks, either you're totally invincible (almost at least) or you become sword fodder. You have been lucky the last 2 or 3 times we've fought though... |
|
|
Back to top |
|
syndrome |
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 11:55 pm |
|
|
Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 423
Location: A cold place.
|
|
Back to top |
|
Guest |
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 12:55 am |
|
|
Joined:
Posts:
Location:
|
Phazanzar wrote: Not lucky, cycle-management
AKA: Hand-Cloggage |
|
|
Back to top |
|
syndrome |
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 12:57 pm |
|
|
Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 423
Location: A cold place.
|
theOmnipotentOne wrote: Phazanzar wrote: Not lucky, cycle-management
AKA: Hand-Cloggage I discard a card almost every chance I can reconcile... If I choose a less worthy card to discard instead of a clever hobbits or nasty, there is no hand cloggage... I couldn't get rid of it anyway.
Where Shall We Go and Don't Look at them take care of a lot of cloggage.
Smeagol is pretty apt at cycling. |
http://myspace/delicatesituation |
|
Back to top |
|
|