| Author |
Message |
Rate this article!
| 5 (Best) |
| [ 0 ] 0% |
| |
| 4 |
| [ 2 ] 50% |
| |
| 3 |
| [ 2 ] 50% |
| |
| 2 |
| [ 0 ] 0% |
| |
| 1 (Worst) |
| [ 0 ] 0% |
| |
Total Votes : 4 |
|
| sickofpalantirs |
![]() Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:29 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 7750
Location: somwhere, over the rainbow way up high. There's a land that I heard of once in a lullaby.
|
| oh yeah I believe it is R-listed though. |
 Sop's haves/ top wants
(mm)"SoP: you will always be the Official CC Spammer in my heart"
"DáinIronfoot"
Spammers really are amazing creatures. You can learn all there is to know about their ways in a month. And yet, after a hundred years, they can still surprise you.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
| NBarden |
![]() Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:27 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 5468
Location: I don't know...
|
| Okay, I’m voting. The article is ok, but that’s it, ok. Its not really that ingenious or new. The lack of a matchup section penalized it at least one level. And you have tons of typos. However, a somewhat solid article, a good deck, but just didn’t strike me as a top-notch article. So, I give it a 3. |
-Trade With Me
 Add the popcorn smiley to your sig, help it achieve world domination.
What if the hokey pokey really IS what its all about? 
As I lay in bed staring at the stars last night, I thought to myself, "where the heck is the ceiling?"
Spotlight on....Sense of Obligation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| CarpeGuitarrem |
![]() Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 12:23 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Posts: 3361
Location: Franciscan University of Steubenville
|
sickofpalantirs wrote: oh yeah I believe it is R-listed though.
Nope. It’s not on any lists. Decipher has to have a member vote before it X’s or R’s anything in Expanded, and it never got around to voting on Demoralized. |
| "ok, change of plans. the Cobracards christmas party is coming to my house, and we’re gunna teach FM how to hunt." (mm) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| LeeRoy Jenkins |
![]() Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 3:16 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 05 Nov 2006
Posts: 19
Location:
|
I think you are quite wrong with your explanation of Broad-bladed sword.
It says you can only take wounds during skirmish phases and it doesn’t say "only wounds from losing a skirmish". So all wounds can be assigned to the bearer as long as the bearer is skirmishing or another minions is skirmishing. In other words: As long as you are in the skirmish phase the sword is only a strength enhancer.
Please correct me, if I am the one who is wrong.  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| CarpeGuitarrem |
![]() Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 3:26 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Posts: 3361
Location: Franciscan University of Steubenville
|
| No, that’s entirely right, since it says "skirmish phases". If it said "except during a skirmish", it would be completely different. But because it says "phases", it lasts for all skirmishes. |
| "ok, change of plans. the Cobracards christmas party is coming to my house, and we’re gunna teach FM how to hunt." (mm) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| macheteman |
![]() Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 4:14 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 07 Dec 2006
Posts: 1200
Location: The Jungle
|
it is good to see an article from you LC911. you had some interesting points, and some good ideas. you could really take this article to a new level if you put a little more work in, and added some more decks based on the great ways to add wounds you talked about, or a mach-up section. it would be really cool to see a deck backed by elves, or gimli, legolas, eowyn start. you did give me an idea to have a three-hunters/eowyn fellowship.
overall, the article was decent and easy to read, but could have been much better with some extra work. |
Check out my best article The Utterly Corrupt Corruption,
If at first you don't succeed...Sky-diving isn't for you.
"Combat is dangerous. It tends to interupt your breathing process."
ROLF!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Gagnut |
![]() Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:33 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 846
Location: Ames, Iowa
|
NBarden wrote: gagnut, why are you so pessimistic?
That’s just my opinion, most of the strategies I’ve seen are based on newer sets, and Free Peoples. |
| I don't have an avatar, I don't have a sig, my posts speak for themselves. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| sperzdechly |
![]() Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 1:29 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 05 May 2006
Posts: 131
Location: Warsaw (Poland)
|
Good article and poor deck at the end.
JayPL has written most of the things I had on my mind during reading. I would certainly add Merry, Swordthain to play back key-possesions, change Dernhelm’s Blade to Spear of the Mark and add some Unheeded/ Shadowplay to get rid of nastly minions like Rallying Orc or Mumak Commander, before they mess around.
Generally I enjoyed your article. It’s a pitty that you finished it with suach a deck...but I think you deserve 4. Just to keep you writing. Hope I’ll able to give you 5 for your next one! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Forum index » Lord of the Rings TCG » LOTR TCG Strategy Article Contest
