| Author |
Message |
| Anonymous Prodigy |
![]() Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:02 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 4197
Location: United States
|
BattleWarg wrote: macheteman wrote: yeah, i think AP is right. we tied. there is no reason i should move on and not BW.
I’m kind of wondering too. I think the only thing different is the order in which we were voted for. (And, yes, I’d likely say something similar if we were reversed)
Each of us got a 1 vote and a 3 vote, but yours were submitted first (by two posts each) - and your personal votes were first. That’s all I’m seeing, but I know I miss stuff.
Order really doesn’t matter. Both of you had the same number of votes in total; I wonder what CBB will do for a tie-breaker.  |
| I had to put something here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| BattleWarg |
![]() Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:16 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Posts: 579
Location:
|
Anonymous Prodigy wrote: Order does matter, as far as I know. I think that when a person votes, 1st gets 4 points, 2nd gets 3 points, and so on. 
Anonymous Prodigy wrote: Order really doesn’t matter. Both of you had the same number of votes in total; I wonder what CBB will do for a tie-breaker.
But yes, I could see if the votes were something like a pair of twos or a two and three ones against a single four vote. But that’s kind of what I was saying... And of course, it matters to you, as you’re up against whichever one of us moves on. However it’s done, though, good luck macheteman!  |
Our time here is ending...
What did you want to see before the end?
It will be made in the Request-a-card Set #1 (name ideas also welcome ). |
|
| Back to top |
|
| macheteman |
![]() Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:20 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 07 Dec 2006
Posts: 1200
Location: The Jungle
|
| thanks, but i think we should hold a tie-breaker contest. that’s what i would do if i were hosting the contest. |
Check out my best article The Utterly Corrupt Corruption,
If at first you don't succeed...Sky-diving isn't for you.
"Combat is dangerous. It tends to interupt your breathing process."
ROLF!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Anonymous Prodigy |
![]() Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:20 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 4197
Location: United States
|
BattleWarg wrote: And of course, it matters to you, as you’re up against whichever one of us moves on.
That is not why I am debating who advances; I just didn’t want to see somebody get cheated out of a Round 2 berth.  |
| I had to put something here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| BattleWarg |
![]() Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:26 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Posts: 579
Location:
|
macheteman wrote: thanks, but i think we should hold a tie-breaker contest. that’s what i would do if i were hosting the contest.
Yeah, all we can do for now is wait to see and work on Galadriel in case...
And I was actually saying "However it’s done" as opposed to "However, it’s done", in case there was confusion. So whether we have a tiebreaker or one of us is moved on by CBB’s vote, I’m wishing you luck.
Anonymous Prodigy wrote: That is not why I am debating who advances; I just didn’t want to see somebody get cheated out of a Round 2 berth.
Well, of course that’s not why - if we have a contest, it means that the one that made the better card faces you. If we don’t, then whoever you face may not have made the better card (but might have). |
Our time here is ending...
What did you want to see before the end?
It will be made in the Request-a-card Set #1 (name ideas also welcome ). |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Anonymous Prodigy |
![]() Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:33 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 4197
Location: United States
|
BattleWarg wrote:
Anonymous Prodigy wrote: That is not why I am debating who advances; I just didn’t want to see somebody get cheated out of a Round 2 berth.
Well, of course that’s not why - if we have a contest, it means that the one that made the better card faces you. If we don’t, then whoever you face may not have made the better card (but might have).
Hopefully, CBB will break the tie with his own vote. Good luck to whoever I face!  |
| I had to put something here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Mouth of Saruman |
![]() Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 10:20 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 190
Location: Orthanc
|
| Card sent. Good luck to all competitors! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Celebrimbor |
![]() Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 10:49 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 953
Location: UNKNOWN
|
Anonymous Prodigy wrote: As far as I can see, BW and mm both had 4 votes, so why is mm advancing? Shouldn’t there be some sort of tie-breaker DC or a few extra votes on their cards? 
OK, I overlooked the mistake I made. My apologies. 
We’ll suspend the current round for now, forget about the deadline.
BattleWarg and Macheteman, design for me the Bonus DC "Cirdan, Counselor of the Wise". I think Thursday would be a reasonable deadline, but if you can’t get it in by then, I can be flexible, as it was my mistake, after all. |
My Trading List
Popcorn is not gooey like fat, and also not crunchy like potato chips, but crispy like lettuce which makes it a healthy snack.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
| macheteman |
![]() Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 10:57 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 07 Dec 2006
Posts: 1200
Location: The Jungle
|
DC sent.
-mm |
Check out my best article The Utterly Corrupt Corruption,
If at first you don't succeed...Sky-diving isn't for you.
"Combat is dangerous. It tends to interupt your breathing process."
ROLF!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
| DáinIronfoot |
![]() Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 9:43 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 4594
Location: Beltsville, MD, USA
|
| Yay for vote-offs! |
Best regards, Dáin, Vice Aftokrator of the Chosen Ones
Check out Lasting Alliances, The Road Ahead, and Ages of Middle-earth, three of my five dream card sets that make up Wars of the Ring. Oh, and I have a trade list now!
Also, if you're into DCs or RPGs (or even if you're not!), check out Realms of Middle-earth, the sequel to CG's "DC Adventure", Realms of the North! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Forum index » Lord of the Rings TCG » LOTR TCG Dream Cards