Author |
Message |
JayPL |
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 8:36 am |
|
|
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 62
Location: Far, far away
|
|
Back to top |
|
Foresight |
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 8:42 am |
|
|
Joined: 06 Feb 2007
Posts: 557
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
|
Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but I would assume that since Final Strike is triggered as a response action as opposed to a maneuver action, that it would get priority over the maneuver action. (Otherwise the card would be useless, right?) Final Strike pretty much butts-in when the cost of performing the maneuver/archery special ability is payed and before the effect takes place. So you can use it to prevent Perspective from working. |
In his eyes was the look of a hunted beast seeking some gap in the ring of his enemies.  |
|
Back to top |
|
Merrick_Hale |
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 8:48 am |
|
|
Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 445
Location: Austin, Texas
|
According to the comprehensive rules book 4.0 Response entry:
Quote: A special ability or event labeled with the word “Response:” indicates that you may perform that action whenever the trigger described in its game text happens.
You may respond more than once to the same situation.
A response action is not a phase action (because there is no “response phase”). A response is a special ability. Therefore once the free people’s player has paid the costs of adding two threats and spotting the wizard, you cannot use any responses or other phase special abilities until the regroup phase.
In response to foresight the action has to complete before it can be responded to unless there is the trigger "is about to". The effect takes place but would later be canceled by final strike. Unfortunately, the effect of Perspective is such that it prevents the prevention. |
Last edited by Merrick_Hale on Wed May 09, 2007 10:18 am; edited 1 time in totalAaron Rhinehart
Rider of Rohan (retired)
DAgent #417 (retired)
This Incognito is a smooth operator - Lem0nhead |
|
Back to top |
|
lem0nhead |
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 9:07 am |
|
|
Joined: 02 Apr 2007
Posts: 2981
Location: Blood Island
|
Tsk tsk tsk. Cant even stop it now! Bad card. |
Ban shampoo, demand real poo.
My Trade List and CC References
"Smart guy, especially considering his head is filled with lemon juice and seeds. That boy’s juicy brain is FULL of good stuff" ~ DainIronfoot
"No fair! And all I got was an oily unconscious steward!" ~ Pippin.
"Okay, stop me if you've heard this one. An elf, a man, and a dwarf walk into the Riddermark..." ~ Eomer |
|
Back to top |
|
JayPL |
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 9:07 am |
|
|
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 62
Location: Far, far away
|
i’d tend to agree with MH but IMO with this card D created even more confusion , not mentioning it is extremely OP for being Uncommon |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Foresight |
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 9:22 am |
|
|
Joined: 06 Feb 2007
Posts: 557
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
|
Treachery and Deciet needs to be banned! (Or at least from tournament play so that in casual play if somebody uses those cards you can have fun seeing who can give the other the most broken/OP cards!...or not. ) |
In his eyes was the look of a hunted beast seeking some gap in the ring of his enemies.  |
|
Back to top |
|
bobtheorc |
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 10:35 am |
|
|
Joined: 19 Mar 2006
Posts: 1218
Location: Wow, its hot in Iowa
|
|
Back to top |
|
AgentDrake |
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 10:46 am |
|
|
Joined: 01 Apr 2007
Posts: 667
Location: Halfway between eccentric and insane...
|
bobtheorc wrote: Of course there is the theory that all these spoilers are fake and that the real cards are much better and less OP.
Don’t get our hopes up. D isn’t that cunning. At least, not anymore.  |
Never kid about politicians. The more bizarre the joke, the more likely it is to come true. |
|
Back to top |
|
bobtheorc |
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 11:19 am |
|
|
Joined: 19 Mar 2006
Posts: 1218
Location: Wow, its hot in Iowa
|
|
Back to top |
|
corvus |
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 12:17 pm |
|
|
Joined: 13 Oct 2006
Posts: 1696
Location: Roaming, but dangerous!!!
|
Merrick_Hale wrote: According to the comprehensive rules book 4.0 Response entry:
Quote: A special ability or event labeled with the word “Response:” indicates that you may perform that action whenever the trigger described in its game text happens.
You may respond more than once to the same situation.
A response action is not a phase action (because there is no “response phase”). A response is a special ability. Therefore once the free people’s player has paid the costs of adding two threats and spotting the wizard, you cannot use any responses or other phase special abilities until the regroup phase.
In response to foresight the action has to complete before it can be responded to unless there is the trigger "is about to". The effect takes place but would later be canceled by final strike. Unfortunately, the effect of Perspective is such that it prevents the prevention.
Excuse me, but it is nowhere said that the maneuver action is performed completely. I’d rule totally differently. I thought of final strike as the only non-condition removal way to cancel this NPE effect. Don’t break that myth for me...  |
Click here if you want to trade some foils away
Far, Far beyond the island we dwelt in shapes of twilight
Through draught and weary days
Through grief and endless pain |
|
Back to top |
|
|