| Author |
Message |
| Piecesofeight |
![]() Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:35 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 71
Location:
|
| Prized Lagan is the most broken card in both of these sets, a 0 cost condition that has no cultural enforcement and can make any fierce minion not fierce for the cost of 1 threat. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| NBarden |
![]() Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 9:48 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 5468
Location: I don't know...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| sickofpalantirs |
![]() Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 6:47 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 7750
Location: somwhere, over the rainbow way up high. There's a land that I heard of once in a lullaby.
|
hum...yeah  it isn’t THAT good. I mean fierce isn’t an essential keyword. |
 Sop's haves/ top wants
(mm)"SoP: you will always be the Official CC Spammer in my heart"
"DáinIronfoot"
Spammers really are amazing creatures. You can learn all there is to know about their ways in a month. And yet, after a hundred years, they can still surprise you.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
| AnxiousChieftain |
![]() Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 9:24 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 15 Jul 2005
Posts: 3947
Location: Maryland
|
I don’t know what Decipher was thinking when they made the card... I mean, even if needed to spot 2 Hobbits it would still be incredibly good.
- AC |
| MODS RULE. - lem0nhead |
|
| Back to top |
|
| raptor22 |
![]() Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 9:27 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 18 Feb 2007
Posts: 196
Location:
|
Piecesofeight wrote: Prized Lagan is the most broken card in both of these sets, a 0 cost condition that has no cultural enforcement and can make any fierce minion not fierce for the cost of 1 threat.
Yeah, it’s kinda like Destroyers and Usurpers, no cultural enforcement and completly shuts down certain decks... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| CarpeGuitarrem |
![]() Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 9:49 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Posts: 3361
Location: Franciscan University of Steubenville
|
| It’s far worse than D&U. Nullifying fierce and nullifying d+1 are hardly on the same plane. |
| "ok, change of plans. the Cobracards christmas party is coming to my house, and we’re gunna teach FM how to hunt." (mm) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| redoschi |
![]() Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 10:40 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 06 Jun 2006
Posts: 30
Location:
|
| this needs a threat, D&U needs nothing |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| CarpeGuitarrem |
![]() Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 11:22 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Posts: 3361
Location: Franciscan University of Steubenville
|
| In terms of the effect, this is much worse. And I agree, D&U needs a spotting requirement. But nullifying d+1 is much less disastrous than nullifying fierce. I don’t recall the last time I actually used d+1. Ever. |
| "ok, change of plans. the Cobracards christmas party is coming to my house, and we’re gunna teach FM how to hunt." (mm) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| bobtheorc |
![]() Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:49 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 19 Mar 2006
Posts: 1218
Location: Wow, its hot in Iowa
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Foresight |
![]() Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 10:27 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 06 Feb 2007
Posts: 557
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
|
| True, but you can’t tell me that taking away an opponent’s chance of survival against you with one, swift card that doesn’t have a spotting requirement or any other such requirement is fair. (Assuming you’re using D&U in a swarm deck) I guess it IS a condition, and it CAN be discarded, but condition discard is not easy for some cultures. |
Last edited by Foresight on Sun Jun 17, 2007 3:14 pm; edited 1 time in totalIn his eyes was the look of a hunted beast seeking some gap in the ring of his enemies.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Forum index » Lord of the Rings TCG » LOTR TCG: Treachery and Deceit
