Author |
Message |
Rate this article!
5 (Best) |
[ 0 ] 0% |
|
4 |
[ 0 ] 0% |
|
3 |
[ 1 ] 33% |
|
2 |
[ 2 ] 66% |
|
1 (Worst) |
[ 0 ] 0% |
|
Total Votes : 3 |
|
Felipe Musco |
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 1:39 pm |
|
|
Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 2434
Location: Florianópolis, SC, Brasil
|
Well, the interaction is drawing more cards to set up a mini-combo faster. basically this. |
I don't like YOU. |
|
Back to top |
|
Cobra |
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 8:45 am |
|
|
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 1202
Location: Austin, TX, USA
|
Congratulations to mr.otto on taking fifth place (and $5 store credit) in March’s Magic: The Gathering Strategy Article Contest!
The thing that’s conspicuously missing from this article is some analysis of how it fares against other decks. This is usually done with a "matchups" section, but if you prefer some other format you could also try a tournament report or a set of playtesting reports. Basically you want to get as much experience with your decks as possible, and make that come through in your article. Even if you don’t end up making a lot of changes to the deck, the testing gives you credibility, and it gives us more good material to read.
Cheers,
Conor |
http://cobracards.com -- Web's best deals on Trading Card Games. |
|
Back to top |
|
|