| Author |
Message |
Rate this article!
| 5 (Best) |
| [ 4 ] 36% |
| |
| 4 |
| [ 1 ] 9% |
| |
| 3 |
| [ 1 ] 9% |
| |
| 2 |
| [ 2 ] 18% |
| |
| 1 (Worst) |
| [ 3 ] 27% |
| |
Total Votes : 11 |
|
| inresponse |
![]() Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 5:25 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 162
Location:
|
| I think eminent domain is good, but it can be beaten. Naturalize can’t deal with it on it’s own, but to write it off as an unwinnable match up is a mistake. If it is one of few bad match ups and you expect to face it, include more cards in your sideboard to deal solely with that. I think you could have a shot at winning the match for sure. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| La_Sin_Grail |
![]() Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:45 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 806
Location: Maryland
|
I don’t mean to quite write it off as unwinnable, just as a difficult matchup. Much harder than say, the Zoo the every newb in the world is raving about.
Shaman is intended to be anti anything playing jitte or meloku, but I suppose it’s a little redundant to put in that much art. hate. Add stone rain? That tends to hurt control... I’m not sure what else this deck could put up that would. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Cobra |
![]() Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 6:51 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 1202
Location: Austin, TX, USA
|
| Congrats to La_Sin_Grail, whose article takes 2nd place in the February 2006 Magic: The Gathering Strategy Article Contest. |
| http://cobracards.com -- Web's best deals on Trading Card Games. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Forum index » Magic: The Gathering » MTG Strategy Article Contest
