| Author |
Message |
| TheJord |
![]() Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 5:42 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 16 Feb 2007
Posts: 486
Location: UK
|
| Will someone please play against me!? PM me for an IP |
| "The rule of Gondor is mine!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
| MR. Lurtzy |
![]() Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 7:13 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 30 May 2007
Posts: 423
Location: Living with the Governator
|
I will once you are done with your game.  |
'On and on old war shall go,
Without respite my blood will flow
O’er your eyes ‘til they cannot see
The impossibility of victory.'
MR. Lurtzy's Have/Wants |
|
| Back to top |
|
| TheJord |
![]() Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 7:39 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 16 Feb 2007
Posts: 486
Location: UK
|
Mythdracon’s Hobbits with Grim/Besiegers
vs
My Hunter  w/Eowyn, LoI with  Archery
Feel the full force of NPE Hunter Elf archery. Poor big besiegers didnt really get a chance, I think I had one skirmish at site 8 and Eowyn did her trick. The sad troll assigned to Galadriel never even got to fight.
His Hobbits did well against my archers, I didnt really ever get a good setup, plus Pallando kept eating my conditions  but I had him in my sights at site 7 and if he hadnt had to leave I would of added about 11 arrows at the site, with Frodo having 8 burdens and 3 out of 5 companions exhausted, it wasnt looking good.
Good game, no winner, but I think had he not had to go to dinner I would have killed him or outrun him. |
| "The rule of Gondor is mine!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Mythdracon |
![]() Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:32 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 439
Location:
|
I’m pretty sure you woulda won unless I’d been lucky. Howdah + Caravan of the South = OMG SO MUCH ARCHERY MUST KILL SOMEONE OFF WHO WILL IT BE. XD
And as I was a noob and everything had to be done manually we went back and forth to the manuever phase several times. I guess I’m too used to games with my friends where we’re allowed to take back certain actions so long as they’re not in the skirmish phase. O_o
Good game though. Now I know how powerful Elves are. ESPECIALLY with Namarie. That card is so Overpowered. XD |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| MR. Lurtzy |
![]() Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 10:07 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 30 May 2007
Posts: 423
Location: Living with the Governator
|
couldn’t connect.  |
'On and on old war shall go,
Without respite my blood will flow
O’er your eyes ‘til they cannot see
The impossibility of victory.'
MR. Lurtzy's Have/Wants |
|
| Back to top |
|
| gil-estel |
![]() Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 7:22 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 545
Location: Groningen, the Netherlands
|
Mythdracon wrote: I’m pretty sure you woulda won unless I’d been lucky. Howdah + Caravan of the South = OMG SO MUCH ARCHERY MUST KILL SOMEONE OFF WHO WILL IT BE. XD
And as I was a noob and everything had to be done manually we went back and forth to the manuever phase several times. I guess I’m too used to games with my friends where we’re allowed to take back certain actions so long as they’re not in the skirmish phase. O_o
Good game though. Now I know how powerful Elves are. ESPECIALLY with Namarie. That card is so Overpowered. XD
Namarie is way, way too stupid! I agree. Howdaw can only give the bonus once. So 4 extra arrows per turn. No mather how many tokens are there. I’m afraid that a good deck nowadays has to put in a lot of condition discard, because of the brute power of some conditions. |
My trading list
My main wants
My refs |
|
| Back to top |
|
| TheJord |
![]() Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:55 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 16 Feb 2007
Posts: 486
Location: UK
|
| I need someone to play against if anyone can play. PM me for an IP |
| "The rule of Gondor is mine!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
| TheJord |
![]() Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:15 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 16 Feb 2007
Posts: 486
Location: UK
|
fishfleas Rohan with 
vs
My 3 Hunters and Bouncing Pippin with Retribution Troll Swarm
I went first, got Thorongil and setup with Namarie and Focus. Then, of course, Buckland Homestead came out about 4 times, discarding every Namarie, FT3H, Focus and NQP I put out! Argh! It meants a tough fight for my deck, but by about site 6 my setup was starting to show its strength.
Now, Retribution Trolls are no fun to play against. Troll at least every site, 6 burdens by site 5, 3 companions dead with just Eomer left.
We had to finish with me at site 6 and FF at site 5. I’m sure he would of continued to discard ALL my conditions and cause me considerable pain, but in the end he gave me the win.
Winner: Me, declared by fishfleas |
| "The rule of Gondor is mine!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
| TheJord |
![]() Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:58 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 16 Feb 2007
Posts: 486
Location: UK
|
Gillian’s  Ents / Corsairs
vs
My  Knights / Nazgul Corruption
A large fellowship is no good for my corruption deck... so hard to exhaust and get Dark Fell About Him.
He went first and I mulliganed. I got nothing for the first 2 sites, and we both moved to site 3 unscathed. My Knights were setting up nicely, Elendil with his new Narsil, which meant his War Galleys and other corsair possessions could be discarded. He threw out a nice swarm at site 5, discarding all my Gondor Bows and forcing Isildur to fight. I weathered the storm, hoping beyond hope my corruption would work.
I had added a few burdens here and there, so he moved to Neekerbreekers Bog and exerted everyone. Lingering Shadow on Huorn, with him exhausted and Enquea with 3 vitality left, Dark Fell About Him added 2 burdens per wound meaning 6 burdens in one go. Corrupted 
Winner: Me by corruption |
| "The rule of Gondor is mine!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Gillian |
![]() Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:46 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 08 Dec 2006
Posts: 127
Location:
|
I’ve made mistake when I leave Huorn exhausted, that could be prevented. Anyway I didn’t have much chance against coruption, my only coruption removal was Glamdring, and I didn’t draw it.
Both side of your deck were hard matchup for me, I could play 7 minions on site 5, but that wouldn’t be enough for Isildur.
Good game Jordy.
Anyone else for game? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Forum index » Lord of the Rings TCG » Open Lord of the Rings Discussion