Author |
Message |
Hvirfilvindr |
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 9:50 am |
|
|
Joined:
Posts:
Location:
|
I see the threads for level 36 and level 45 are up, so SOMEONE must have gotten the answer right.
I’m so caught up with the three-headed doggies - am I even on the right track? I entered ’Three Dreams’, whiched seemed the most logical, but that answer was rejected. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Emoticon |
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 11:16 am |
|
|
Joined:
Posts:
Location:
|
You’re on the right track - I entered "Three Dreams" like twelve times before I realized that it may not be his multi-headed quality that is relevant to the card. . . |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Hvirfilvindr |
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 11:20 am |
|
|
Joined:
Posts:
Location:
|
I also tried ’Parallel Thoughts’, which would make sense, but no luck. Is it important that Cerberus is the dog referred to in the riddle, or would any dog (i.e. Lassie) do just as well? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Emoticon |
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 11:27 am |
|
|
Joined:
Posts:
Location:
|
Heh. I’d say Cerberus is a pretty important dog, wouldn’t you? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Hvirfilvindr |
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 11:37 am |
|
|
Joined:
Posts:
Location:
|
Well, he isn’t Hell’s Caretaker (not the answer), but he is the watchdog of the underworld. I imagine that Cerberus being asleep would mean that naughty dead things would be left free to wander around. Am I going anywhere with this? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Emoticon |
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 11:40 am |
|
|
Joined:
Posts:
Location:
|
Yes. Yes you are. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Emoticon |
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 11:41 am |
|
|
Joined:
Posts:
Location:
|
Except for the naughty dead things. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Hvirfilvindr |
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 11:48 am |
|
|
Joined:
Posts:
Location:
|
Fine, then ALIVE things can wander around.
’Collective Unconscious’ would make sense, but since I just posted it, obviously isn’t the answer. :frown: |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Emoticon |
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 11:50 am |
|
|
Joined:
Posts:
Location:
|
Go back to your original thinking. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|