| Author |
Message |
Rate this article!
| 5 (Best) |
| [ 2 ] 50% |
| |
| 4 |
| [ 0 ] 0% |
| |
| 3 |
| [ 1 ] 25% |
| |
| 2 |
| [ 0 ] 0% |
| |
| 1 (Worst) |
| [ 1 ] 25% |
| |
Total Votes : 4 |
|
| reggierockz |
![]() Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:35 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 55
Location: Rochester, NY
|
About the site path. I’ve never had any trouble tagging on the two burdens. The problem with many of the burden adding sites is that they are so low in twighlight number. I need to pack enough 3 twighlight sites in order to assure that I have enough juice. Most decks pack some sort of burden removal anyway, which would make the site a complete waste. I can see your reasoning, but still, I don’t think it is needed. I’d rather be more assured that I won’t get twighlight denied by packing three (3) twighlight sites.
Also, someone gave this article a one... with no explanation behind it. Who ever left that rating, would you please comment as to why you rated this article so low? Thank you.
-reggierockz |
| "They have a cave troll." |
|
| Back to top |
|
| CarpeGuitarrem |
![]() Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:51 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Posts: 3361
Location: Franciscan University of Steubenville
|
Maybe they thought "1" was the best rating...  |
| "ok, change of plans. the Cobracards christmas party is coming to my house, and we’re gunna teach FM how to hunt." (mm) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Forum index » Lord of the Rings TCG » LOTR TCG Strategy Article Contest
