| Author |
Message |
Rate this article!
| 5 (Best) |
| [ 1 ] 12% |
| |
| 4 |
| [ 2 ] 25% |
| |
| 3 |
| [ 4 ] 50% |
| |
| 2 |
| [ 1 ] 12% |
| |
| 1 (Worst) |
| [ 0 ] 0% |
| |
Total Votes : 8 |
|
| ure_d_best |
![]() Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 11:33 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 02 Apr 2006
Posts: 43
Location: Kelowna, BC
|
All I see in the deck is a cute combo, and yes it is cute but not competitive and will not see this in tournament play. Also, the article itself needs improvement, it is always good to see match up analysis for such deck.
With combo decks like this one, you definitely need some tutor cards to get the combo out, especially not seeing any other good win conditions in here. You get extracted ones and it is over for you. Add balance to the deck to make it competitive, I mean balance by adding other win conditions and card advantage (remember you are running blue and black here) to dig further in your deck. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Cobra |
![]() Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:39 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 1202
Location: Austin, TX, USA
|
Nice article!
Others have covered things pretty thoroughly I think. I would just add that the whole issue of competitive vs. fun raises a good point -- that this article seems stuck halfway in between.  I usually suggest picking one or the other to emphasize, and then really bringing that out in the article. For the competitive route, matchups are the way to go. For the fun route, give us some good stories.  |
| http://cobracards.com -- Web's best deals on Trading Card Games. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Felipe Musco |
![]() Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 7:05 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 2434
Location: Florianópolis, SC, Brasil
|
| Stories... Now, I had never thought about doing this in fun decks! Very good idea!!! |
| I don't like YOU. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Forum index » Magic: The Gathering » MTG Strategy Article Contest
