Look who’s talking about not facing trolls!

But I agree, very few decks pack Uruk-Hai any more. Although Trolls still exist. But you really don’t want to be playing them!

i know that i play trolls, but not many people do, and the Uruk-hai are a dying breed, i just see it as a useless card that is just taking up space, but if your mainly playing against uruk-hai decks, then by all means, keep them in, i just dont think it is a very good card for tournament play because if your opponent doesn’t play uruk-hai or trolls, its just gonna clog your hand. (that was a very long run-on sentence )

why 2x stone trolls? it seems like a useless card unless your facing trolls or uruk-hai, i would remove it and put in another sudden fury and fates entwined

Is Sam any better the Pippin of Merry or any other Hobbit?

Even more so then most other Hobbits.

Corruption: with Bilbo, Aged Ring-bearer, Sting, Weapon of Heritage on Sam, and Tom Bombadil corrupting my Frodo can be extremely difficult.

Combo- sam with Frodo, Very Nice Master and Smeagol, Slinker.

Another idea would be to have the hunters Gandalf and have Alatar to transfer without adding burdens plus for his minion minus strength bonus.

When I reveal Pippin, Hobbit of Some Intelligence I can remove one of the burdens I bid.

I play Green Dragon Inn as site 1, and exert Pippin, Hobbit of some Intelligence and Merry, Horticulturist to play Bilbo, Aged Ringbearer from my draw deck, removing a burden with Frodo, Tired Traveller (Frodo, Old Bilbo’s Heir is another option for ringbearer in this deck).

Lots of spelling and grammar mistakes, makes this article a drag to read. Combined with a few gameplay errors, and the fact that you are rounding up your article with a deck that couldn’t possibly win anything (especiallly not in open format), makes it easy for me to give you a rating of 2 (and that’s including an extra star for effort.

Eh... What??
it is a question the article was asking.



Minor error only, but just an example of the myriad og similar errors in your article.
I don’t get what is wrong about this.



I’m not sure how Tom Bombadil will be corrupting Frodo, but it’s a strategy I would like to hear more about!
goodness! Read this through and think about it. Are you using a translator or something you seem to be misinterpreting my sentences. it means I can use his ability to remove 2 burdens so with all my burden removal corrupting my ringbearer woudl be hard



Dang! I’m missing this Frodo in my collection!
sorry I meant master of the precious I will fix that immediately



I’m really not mad enough to get the finer points of this sentence.
what finer points? It is a follower on sam so you can use his ability, and you use the hunters gandalf to make alatar’s ability work. (though I guess you could use radagast or treebeard instead).



Nice! You can reveal Pippin to remove a burden?
OK play him in my starting fellowship I will edit that.



Well, you might do that, but then you would be cheating. Frodo’s special ability cannot be used with a start-of-the-fellowship-phase action.
OK I didn’t no that you could have alerted me to it instead of grilling me about"bad strategy"


Generally, you should be more aware of punctuation, the use of commas, and capital letters in new sentences. Your article is FULL of these minor, yet very annoying errors. You should actually be glad I rated it a 2, and not a 1, but I was in a good mood

I would like to either see a good overview of the Sams, or else a look at Great Elf Warrior...you can pick which one.