Author |
Message |
TheHobbit13 |
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 7:16 pm |
|
|
Joined:
Posts:
Location:
|
I have got a ? What is the advantage of site control |
|
|
Back to top |
|
sickofpalantirs |
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 8:01 pm |
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 7750
Location: somwhere, over the rainbow way up high. There's a land that I heard of once in a lullaby.
|
TheHobbit13 wrote: I have got a ? What is the advantage of site control
site manipulation or site control
in site control there are cards that are better if you control sites. |
Sop's haves/ top wants
(mm)"SoP: you will always be the Official CC Spammer in my heart"
"DáinIronfoot"
Spammers really are amazing creatures. You can learn all there is to know about their ways in a month. And yet, after a hundred years, they can still surprise you. |
|
Back to top |
|
PorterTroll |
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 9:51 pm |
|
|
Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 1193
Location: not sure yet
|
beseigers, the old uruks and dunland work very well off of site control |
|
|
Back to top |
|
bibfortuna25 |
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 9:53 pm |
|
|
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 615
Location: Springfield, OR
|
Dunlending Elder
Ready to Fall
No Retreat
’nuff said |
All cards do what they say. |
|
Back to top |
|
Felipe Musco |
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 3:13 pm |
|
|
Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 2434
Location: Florianópolis, SC, Brasil
|
I think you could try to use Legolas, Greenleaf, due to all your healing ability.
However, my idea would be to splash in Gimli. This would let you use Gandalf, Friend of the Shirefolk, as a 10 strength companion as soon as you played him. Also, you could add in cards like Baruk Khazad and Quick as May Be. You could use Gimli, Lively Combatant or Gimli, Counter of Foes. You could even try using Gimli, Son of Gloin, but that would require massive healing to be just a splash. You could then alter Legolas to be Legolas, Archer of Mirkwood, so you could heal who carriesthe banner or healyour Gimli to use Baruk Khazad again. |
I don't like YOU. |
|
Back to top |
|
|