| Author |
Message |
| orian |
![]() Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:42 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 05 Jun 2006
Posts: 127
Location:
|
AnxiousChieftain wrote: (Hunters block deck)
Shadow (33)
Black Gate Sentry x4 (wounds companions)
Black Land Chieftain x4 (adds threats)
Black Land Overlord x4 (exerts companions)
Black Land Observer x3 (adds threats)
Gollum, Hopeless x4 (uses Not This Time to wound companions)
Mumak Commander, Giant Among the Swertings x3 (exerts companions)
Ugluk, Ugly Fellow x3 (exerts companions)
Ulaire Lemenya, Eternally Threatening x3 (adds threats)
Coordinated Effort x3 (adds twilight)
Not This Time x2 (wounds companions)
Suggestions?
yesterday I made this shadow, base on quite similar techs (standard version of course):
Black gate sentry x4
Black land overlord x3
Black land chieftain x3
Gollum, skulker
captured by the ring x4
not this time! x2
final strike x2
hidden even from her
corsair plunderer x2
corsair marauder x4
southron leader x3
red wrath x3
ulaire lemenya, eternally threatening x3
was pretty fun ^^
about your shadow, I’m not convinced about adding twilights against possessions.
big companies will suffer very much without twilight adding and against point denial you can still wait on double moves or make uncancellable exertions with mumak commander and other guys... + coordinated effort really looks unpredictable to me... well only my thoughts... perhaps unreasonable choice would be better?
if you rely on possessions with black land chieftain + coordinated effort, the risk is that your opponent doesn’t play any possession at all... I’m not really sure, it needs to be tested |
| Last edited by orian on Tue Jul 25, 2006 10:42 am; edited 1 time in totalorian - the French pirate, the Bloody Bastard |
|
| Back to top |
|
| AnxiousChieftain |
![]() Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:51 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 15 Jul 2005
Posts: 3947
Location: Maryland
|
Your deck looks fun, although the Observers need to spot an  condition to add a threat, and there are no conditions included.
Quote: if you rely on possessions with black land chieftain + coordinated effort, the risk is that your opponent doesn’t play any possession at all... I’m not really sure, it needs to be tested
Yes, I was wondering about that. I might change it to Unreasonable Choice. |
| MODS RULE. - lem0nhead |
|
| Back to top |
|
| orian |
![]() Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 10:41 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 05 Jun 2006
Posts: 127
Location:
|
overlord of course, not obersver
edited |
| orian - the French pirate, the Bloody Bastard |
|
| Back to top |
|
| AnxiousChieftain |
![]() Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 11:44 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 15 Jul 2005
Posts: 3947
Location: Maryland
|
| Ah, okay. I didn’t think that the Observers were necessary in that deck, since Lemenya, the Chieftain, and Captured by the Ring all add plenty of threats. |
| MODS RULE. - lem0nhead |
|
| Back to top |
|
| CarpeGuitarrem |
![]() Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 12:10 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Posts: 3361
Location: Franciscan University of Steubenville
|
| orian, it’s Hunters Block, so AC can’t add the cards you mentioned. It is too bad that there aren’t more Hunters cards. But it’s a good deck. |
| "ok, change of plans. the Cobracards christmas party is coming to my house, and we’re gunna teach FM how to hunt." (mm) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| AnxiousChieftain |
![]() Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:31 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 15 Jul 2005
Posts: 3947
Location: Maryland
|
CarpeGuitarrem wrote: orian, it’s Hunters Block, so AC can’t add the cards you mentioned
Yeah, I already let him know earlier. His recent decklists was just an idea for a Standard deck - it wasn’t supposed to be a suggestion for my Hunters block deck. |
| MODS RULE. - lem0nhead |
|
| Back to top |
|
| fingolfin |
![]() Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 2:01 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 321
Location: it's getting hotter in Iowa every day
|
| Works well. how bout like more uruk-hai for their damage bonuses. maybe? |
Soldier: why'd you do that captain?
John Wayne: Because I hate your guts!!
Exerpt from "Iwo Jima." |
|
| Back to top |
|
| AnxiousChieftain |
![]() Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 2:17 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 15 Jul 2005
Posts: 3947
Location: Maryland
|
Nah, I don’t think it needs more Uruks. Ugluk is only in there because for 4 twilight you can get a 12 strength fierce minion who exerts the companion he is skirmishing.
I love how I can exert companions os easily, and then a well-timed Black gate Sentry or Not This Time can finish off a companion and trigger all the threats.  |
| MODS RULE. - lem0nhead |
|
| Back to top |
|
| PorterTroll |
![]() Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 10:08 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 1193
Location: not sure yet
|
I am currently making a deck similar to this to use in an upcoming tournament (the nine companions one).
More companions = higher threat limit!  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| AnxiousChieftain |
![]() Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 9:40 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 15 Jul 2005
Posts: 3947
Location: Maryland
|
Cool. With all the companions in play, Black Land Chieftain + Black Land Overlord would be deadly.  |
| MODS RULE. - lem0nhead |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Forum index » Lord of the Rings TCG » LOTR TCG Deck Clinics » Hunter Block