Author |
Message |
Planeswalker |
Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 1:26 am |
|
|
Joined: 27 Aug 2006
Posts: 8
Location: Michigan
|
Once again my inferior deck skills caused me to swallow a little vomit that came up in my mouth. I still, however, am very fond of Might of Oaks dispite it’s unpopularity. I do like the Giant Solifuge, and will most likley add it to the deck/sideboard.
Here’s another idea then: Remand.
Or will that disrupt my creature drops too much? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Felipe Musco |
Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 8:49 am |
|
|
Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 2434
Location: Florianópolis, SC, Brasil
|
Actually, Remand is a GREAT card! It slows down your opponent for a turn, AND fetches a card! It’s cool, but I would think abou it, if I were to add only Remand, not a single Mana Leak or Rune Snag... |
I don't like YOU. |
|
Back to top |
|
La_Sin_Grail |
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:33 am |
|
|
Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 806
Location: Maryland
|
Remand would work, but I would prefer voidslime to keep any wraths out of the way. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Planeswalker |
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 4:58 pm |
|
|
Joined: 27 Aug 2006
Posts: 8
Location: Michigan
|
One of the preview cards for time spiral seems to match a replacement for the ninja:
Looter il-Kor 1U
Creature-Kor Rouge 1/1
Shadow
Whenever Looter il-Kor deals damage to an opponent, draw a card, then discard a card.
The shadow ability is very nice, and makes up for the discarding drawback. I’m planning on putting him in. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
physcosick |
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 8:25 pm |
|
|
Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 229
Location:
|
He is the ninja of the deep hours replcaement. As for the discarding, it doesn’t have to be a drawback if time spiral gives you a decent number of cards with madness. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Felipe Musco |
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:42 pm |
|
|
Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 2434
Location: Florianópolis, SC, Brasil
|
AND, let’s face it, fixes mana bases pretty good, and Zombify AND Vigor Mortis are still around... |
I don't like YOU. |
|
Back to top |
|
La_Sin_Grail |
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 2:59 pm |
|
|
Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 806
Location: Maryland
|
Yeah, I more like the madness thing, but reanimation, too. If you reanimate with it, it’s still no card advantage, only quality advantage. If you madness, you have raw advantage. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Felipe Musco |
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 3:08 pm |
|
|
Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 2434
Location: Florianópolis, SC, Brasil
|
Hum... I don’t see it that way. You draw a card, and reanimate the card you discarded (it doesn’t have to be the same one). But yes, if you draw what you want reanimated, it’s not a lot of card advantage, but it IS in a sense that you’d normally draw that card the next turn, only, AND you’d have to create a way of discarding it... But OF COURSE Madness is much cooler with discarding, the Looter was probably designed to be used with madness anyway. |
I don't like YOU. |
|
Back to top |
|
La_Sin_Grail |
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 3:37 pm |
|
|
Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 806
Location: Maryland
|
yup. Also, I find compulsive research a much more reliable discarding outlet for reanimation. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Felipe Musco |
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 3:50 pm |
|
|
Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 2434
Location: Florianópolis, SC, Brasil
|
Yeah, but Looter would be neat replacing Sift, it just costs too much! And, well, you throw some Unholy Strength on him and he’s an annoyin’ fella’... Although I’ve seen a preview Instant-speed card-drawer/discarder that’s cool, too. |
I don't like YOU. |
|
Back to top |
|
|