|
Author |
Message |
NBarden |
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:32 pm |
|
|
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 5468
Location: I don't know...
|
Hey everybody!
I think the LotR TCG wikipedia article needs some updating. Here is the section on shadow deck strategies.
Wikipedia wrote:
Beat down decks focus on making one or two minions very powerful, with the intention of destroying all of the companions one by one; eventually getting to the ring-bearer once all the companions are gone. Swarm decks have an opposite strategy: their goal is to play as many minions as possible as cheaply as possible. While one swarm minion might not be very powerful by itself, each minion is very cheap which allows many to be played, easily outnumbering the companions. While they did exist since the first sets, bomb decks have been gradually gaining popularity and have, in some ways, replaced beat-down decks. They combine strategies of both beat-down decks and swarm decks: instead of focusing on one or two powerful minions, they play several minions of medium strength. The goal of a bomb deck is to destroy the weaker companions, and then swarm the Free Peoples player out.
They state nothing about corruption or archery/wounding shadows. I would like to edit the article to include something about corruption and wounding, but I then need to include the concept of resistance.
I need help!
~NBarden |
-Trade With Me
Add the popcorn smiley to your sig, help it achieve world domination.
What if the hokey pokey really IS what its all about?
As I lay in bed staring at the stars last night, I thought to myself, "where the heck is the ceiling?"
Spotlight on....Sense of Obligation. |
|
Back to top |
|
CarpeGuitarrem |
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:02 am |
|
|
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Posts: 3361
Location: Franciscan University of Steubenville
|
Agreed. This is an immense oversimplification.
Free Peoples strategies should also be included, IMO. More than just choke and tank.
(Interesting side note...CobraCards is actually at the bottom of the article, for its deck design archives, right there with Decktech) |
"ok, change of plans. the Cobracards christmas party is coming to my house, and we’re gunna teach FM how to hunt." (mm) |
|
Back to top |
|
NBarden |
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:14 am |
|
|
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 5468
Location: I don't know...
|
All right, let the rewriting begin!
Here’s what I’m thinking, we need to represent the concept of burdens.
So, maybe under Deck Strategies, do seperate articles.
I think that the Free Peoples captures FP strategies to a person that is completely new to LotR and may not care. I mean, name one other major strategy that doesn’t revolve around
1. Giving the fellowship everything it needs to fight
2. Choking the twilight pool
3. Getting rid of the minions before the skirmish
Yeah, I know, sudden fury hobbits, but that’s not a very common strategy.
So, I think we should leave the FP alone. Actually, I think we should do something like this.
As the game expanded, several basic deck strategies were identified and developed. As decks are separated into Shadow and Free People sides, the two sides are to some extent interchangeable, but the best decks usually contain some synergy between both types of cards.
NBarden wrote:
For Free Peoples side, the most common strategies are Tank, Choke, and Minion Wounding.
Tank- Tank decks try to play as much as possible and build up as many companions to combat the opponents Shadow side with force.
Choke- Choke decks, the opposite of tank decks, try to put out as little twilight as possible, denying the opponent resources.
Archery/Minion Wounding- Minion wounding decks try to use "archery fire" and direct wounding to destroy the minions (Shadow characters) before they even have a chance to attack.
Any thoughts?
P.S. I uploaded the picture of Aragorn, Thorongil. Anyone think there should be another picture uploaded there instead? I think they were using the promo oversized Gandalf, but that picture stunk. It didn’t have any of the traits or anything, so I though I would put the most in-demand card in the game there. |
-Trade With Me
Add the popcorn smiley to your sig, help it achieve world domination.
What if the hokey pokey really IS what its all about?
As I lay in bed staring at the stars last night, I thought to myself, "where the heck is the ceiling?"
Spotlight on....Sense of Obligation. |
|
Back to top |
|
NBarden |
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:20 am |
|
|
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 5468
Location: I don't know...
|
|
Back to top |
|
CarpeGuitarrem |
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:27 am |
|
|
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Posts: 3361
Location: Franciscan University of Steubenville
|
Put in a section right after the part where it talks about skirmishes.
Wikipedia wrote: Throughout a game, a player will play companions (or Free People characters) to help defend the ring-bearer. When it is his turn to play as the Shadow player, he then can play minions (or Shadow characters) to attack the opponents companions. The Free People’s player (the defender) has the opportunity to choose which of his companions will fight in one-to-one duels (skirmishes) with the opponents minions. This is called assignment. Since the Free Peoples player wants to defend his ring-bearer, the only way a Shadow player can attack the Free Peoples player is by playing more minions than the Free Peoples player has companions. This forces the Free Peoples player to assign to his ring-bearer.
Then you say...
"Killing the Ring-bearer is not the only focus of the game, however. As Frodo journeyed towards Mount Doom, he was tempted by the power of the Ring. In the game, this is represented by the concept of corruption. Frodo can use the One Ring to protect himself, but as he does, he acquires burdens, which represent the Ring’s hold. If the Ring-bearer accumulates enough burdens, the Shadow wins. This is called a corruption win." |
"ok, change of plans. the Cobracards christmas party is coming to my house, and we’re gunna teach FM how to hunt." (mm) |
|
Back to top |
|
NBarden |
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:07 am |
|
|
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 5468
Location: I don't know...
|
Yeah....good idea...it needs a little rephrasing, like maybe...
"However, the ring-bearer does not only face minions on his journey to destroy the ring. The ring-bearer has to resist the temptation of the ring. In the trading card game, each time the ring-bearer succumbs to the temptation of the ring, a burden is added. If the number of burdens is equivalent to the ring-bearer’s resistance, the ring-bearer is corrupted and loses the game."
How’s that sound? |
Last edited by NBarden on Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:11 am; edited 1 time in total -Trade With Me
Add the popcorn smiley to your sig, help it achieve world domination.
What if the hokey pokey really IS what its all about?
As I lay in bed staring at the stars last night, I thought to myself, "where the heck is the ceiling?"
Spotlight on....Sense of Obligation. |
|
Back to top |
|
menace64 |
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:11 am |
|
|
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 836
Location: Wichita, Kansas
|
You know, I think the article could benefit from a section about the Design-a-Card contest and its winners.
...just sayin’... |
Riddle 9
When I came to Abraham I let him live just a moment longer. When I came to Moses I saved his life more than once. But the salmon... I regret to say I had a hand in its death.
Who am I? |
|
Back to top |
|
NBarden |
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:12 am |
|
|
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 5468
Location: I don't know...
|
|
Back to top |
|
CarpeGuitarrem |
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:14 am |
|
|
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Posts: 3361
Location: Franciscan University of Steubenville
|
NBarden wrote: Yeah....good idea...it needs a little rephrasing, like maybe...
"However, the ring-bearer does not only face minions on his journey to destroy the ring. The ring-bearer has to resist the temptation of the ring. In the trading card game, each time the ring-bearer succumbs to the temptation of the ring, a burden is added. If the number of burdens is equivalent to the ring-bearer’s resistance, the ring-bearer is corrupted and loses the game."
How’s that sound?
I don’t think you need to bring in resistance. Keep it vague. The part about skirmishes doesn’t mention the Strength statistic, or Vitality. |
"ok, change of plans. the Cobracards christmas party is coming to my house, and we’re gunna teach FM how to hunt." (mm) |
|
Back to top |
|
NBarden |
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:16 am |
|
|
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 5468
Location: I don't know...
|
Good point.
Maybe...
"However, the ring-bearer does not only face minions on his journey to destroy the ring. The ring-bearer has to resist the temptation of the ring. In the trading card game, each time the ring-bearer succumbs to the temptation of the ring, a burden is added. If the ring-bearer accumulates to many burdens, he is corrupted and loses the game." |
-Trade With Me
Add the popcorn smiley to your sig, help it achieve world domination.
What if the hokey pokey really IS what its all about?
As I lay in bed staring at the stars last night, I thought to myself, "where the heck is the ceiling?"
Spotlight on....Sense of Obligation. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
All times are UTC - 4
Page 1 of 2 [14 Posts] |
Goto page: 1, 2 Next |
|
|