| Author |
Message |
| AnxiousChieftain |
![]() Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 3:11 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 15 Jul 2005
Posts: 3947
Location: Maryland
|
Pipsqueak wrote: i meant boromir  . he has less resistance and can't keep it going very long
Give him the Ring of Rings and he has 8 resistance. Then play a Scroll of Isildur and a bunch of Sapling of the White Tree, and he has 11 resistance (more than Frodo usually has!).
I play with the Boromir Ring-bearer, and I am almost never corrupted. |
| MODS RULE. - lem0nhead |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Pipsqueak |
![]() Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 3:50 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 331
Location: A northerner down south
|
| Yeah, but that would depend on your drawing the saplings, and you would run out of them eventually. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| AnxiousChieftain |
![]() Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 4:17 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 15 Jul 2005
Posts: 3947
Location: Maryland
|
Pipsqueak wrote: Yeah, but that would depend on your drawing the saplings, and you would run out of them eventually.
Use other artifacts as well then. Narsil, Seeing Stones, Anduril, Ring of Barahir, etc. |
| MODS RULE. - lem0nhead |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Pipsqueak |
![]() Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 4:20 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 331
Location: A northerner down south
|
| you've got to remember that having all of those artifacts, can really bog down your deck. and you would drain too many cards from your deck in order to play for the whole length of the game. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| AnxiousChieftain |
![]() Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 4:24 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 15 Jul 2005
Posts: 3947
Location: Maryland
|
| Keep in mind that the artifacts do stuff in the deck. They aren't just there to add resistance. |
| MODS RULE. - lem0nhead |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Pipsqueak |
![]() Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 5:18 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 331
Location: A northerner down south
|
Anyway, back to the topic.
Like i said, i agree with phazanzar. i love smeagol. Sam SF, isn't an alternate ring-bearer, but can help you out a little bit.  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
![]() Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 5:33 pm |
|
|
|
Joined:
Posts:
Location:
|
Pipsqueak wrote: Anyway, back to the topic.
Like i said, i agree with phazanzar. i love smeagol. Sam SF, isn't an alternate ring-bearer, but can help you out a little bit.
He is, in fact the ONLY non-ringbearer-able Sam there is... I use him in my Pipweed deck for G for Grand, it's fun.  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Hazael |
![]() Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 10:55 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 444
Location: Up North
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
![]() Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 12:59 am |
|
|
|
Joined:
Posts:
Location:
|
Hazael wrote: Im a Frodo guy. 
Obviously because of your lack of sapience to create an effective system to support a ring-bearer other than Frodo in your deck. Dur. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Pipsqueak |
![]() Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 4:45 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 331
Location: A northerner down south
|
I don't know, omnipotentone  . there are other good ring-bearers, but frodo has some pretty good versions, and usually has more resistance than anyone else (for instance: resolute hobbit has 12).  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Forum index » Lord of the Rings TCG » Open Lord of the Rings Discussion